2020
DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v49i9.4101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Analysis of the Temporomandibular Joint in Patients with Malocclusion Using 2D and 3D Measuring Methods

Abstract: The article's abstract is no available.  

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have explored evidence indicating that 3D measurements are better able to ensure the precision of the biometric results than 2D measurement. By comparing and analyzing the morphological parameters of the TMJ of asymptomatic patients using 2D and 3D measuring methods, it was observed that 2D examinations may be biased because of inaccurate positioning, which could lead to incorrect clinical diagnoses [24,25]. Previous studies have been limited to 2D evaluations of the TMJ [18,[26][27][28] or have studied only the changes in the condylar position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the 3D space [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have explored evidence indicating that 3D measurements are better able to ensure the precision of the biometric results than 2D measurement. By comparing and analyzing the morphological parameters of the TMJ of asymptomatic patients using 2D and 3D measuring methods, it was observed that 2D examinations may be biased because of inaccurate positioning, which could lead to incorrect clinical diagnoses [24,25]. Previous studies have been limited to 2D evaluations of the TMJ [18,[26][27][28] or have studied only the changes in the condylar position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the 3D space [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%