Material-Tissue Interfacial Phenomena 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100330-5.00008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologic and structural analysis of material-tissue interfaces relevant to dental reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, stronger silicon signals were detected in dentin after immediate treatment (5.5 weight%), which remained at a similar percentage at the 5-day evaluation (5.8 weight%). Given the organic phase in dentin (30 vol%, mainly type I collagen) [ 31 ], the combination of fluoride–silicon-rich toothpaste and calcium booster appears to allow interactions between the negatively charged surface of SiO 2 (–SiOH 2+ , –SiOH, –SiO) and positively charge-carried collagen, which is pH-dependent [ 32 ]. Electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and complexation all play a role in these interactions [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, stronger silicon signals were detected in dentin after immediate treatment (5.5 weight%), which remained at a similar percentage at the 5-day evaluation (5.8 weight%). Given the organic phase in dentin (30 vol%, mainly type I collagen) [ 31 ], the combination of fluoride–silicon-rich toothpaste and calcium booster appears to allow interactions between the negatively charged surface of SiO 2 (–SiOH 2+ , –SiOH, –SiO) and positively charge-carried collagen, which is pH-dependent [ 32 ]. Electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and complexation all play a role in these interactions [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonding to gingival dentin walls is generally less effective than bonding to axial walls and might not be sufficient to resist interfacial polymerization contraction stresses. Adhesive bond strength studies combining in vivo insertion with in vitro testing indicate a greater incidence of debonding at gingival walls of composite resin restorations [ 11 , 77 , 78 ]. The greatest risk of recurrent caries is at the gingival margins of restorations, irrespective of the kind of restoration.…”
Section: Clinically Challenging Class II Cervical Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it complicates the insertion of direct restorations and appropriate impression taking (traditional or optical) and the delivery of indirect restorations. The imprecision of the restoration’s subgingival margin leads to more biofilm accumulation, gingival and periodontal inflammation, and an increased risk of RC [ 11 , 77 , 78 , 183 ].…”
Section: Protocols To Improve Proximal Contours and Contact Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is a plasmaderived fluid, it also contains inflammatory mediators including cytokines, chemokines, and defensins [16] . The amount of dentinal fluid differs by depth, and the dentin close to the pulp contains more fluid compared to the superficial dentin [17] . Exposure of the pulp-dentin complex causes an outward flow of the dentinal fluid, thereby protecting the pulp.…”
Section: Dentinal Tubulesmentioning
confidence: 99%