2016
DOI: 10.14393/bj-v32n4a2016-26827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morpho-anatomy of leaves and yield of pineapple plant in intercropping with cassava

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the commercial weight, pineapple fruits can be classified into three categories: category A (>1.7 kg), category B (1.3-1.6 kg), and category C (<1.3 kg) [9]. In this light, the "Santa Rosa" ecotype fruits (in the three densities) and "Smooth Cayenne" cultivar fruits (at 55500 plants) were classified as grade A, while the remaining fruits of other treatments were classified as grade B. e average weight of the fruits harvested in this study was higher than the weight reported for "Golden" pineapple fruits grown at densities of 50000 (1.61 kg) and 70000 (1.51 kg) plants ha −1 [7], also exceeding the weight of "Smooth Cayenne" fruits (<1.64 kg) harvested from a cultivation system associated with cassava plants [14]. On the other hand, the results clearly show that yield is strongly influenced by sowing density, a factor that naturally enables a greater number of fruits to be harvested.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characteristics Of the Fruitcontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the commercial weight, pineapple fruits can be classified into three categories: category A (>1.7 kg), category B (1.3-1.6 kg), and category C (<1.3 kg) [9]. In this light, the "Santa Rosa" ecotype fruits (in the three densities) and "Smooth Cayenne" cultivar fruits (at 55500 plants) were classified as grade A, while the remaining fruits of other treatments were classified as grade B. e average weight of the fruits harvested in this study was higher than the weight reported for "Golden" pineapple fruits grown at densities of 50000 (1.61 kg) and 70000 (1.51 kg) plants ha −1 [7], also exceeding the weight of "Smooth Cayenne" fruits (<1.64 kg) harvested from a cultivation system associated with cassava plants [14]. On the other hand, the results clearly show that yield is strongly influenced by sowing density, a factor that naturally enables a greater number of fruits to be harvested.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characteristics Of the Fruitcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…e records of the morphological characteristics of the pineapple plants reported in this study are lower than the values reached by "Queen" cultivar cultivated in three different ecosystems (freshwater peat, brackish peat, and alluvial soil), as they reached a height greater than 80 cm and D-leaf lengths over 65 cm [13]. e quantification of these morphological characteristics (including the number of leaves) is of great importance in pineapple cultivation because they are related to photosynthetic efficiency and fruit development [12][13][14].…”
Section: Plant Growth Parametersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the northern state of Acre, the out of season price per fruit can attain R$ 3.25 (US$ 1.50 approximately) or more depending on the size and quality of the fruit (AGRIANUAL, 2012;BAYMA et al, 2012). In this region, fruit mass may be up to 24.4% lower in full sun cultivation than fruit under shade (CUSTÓDIO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such intercropping systems offer ecological and economical advantages since they enhance biodiversity, increase land-use efficiency, improve soil covering and biomass recycling, and enable the commercialization of additional products. These factors serve to improve the food security and economical stability of family farmers (LUDEWIGS; BRONDIZIO, 2009;ARAÚJO NETO et al, 2014;CUSTÓDIO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otra observación en coincidencia con Montero et al (2017) es que el ambiente lumínico tuvo un efecto indirecto sobre la reproducción: las plantas de B. serra ubicadas en áreas más expuestas fueron más pequeñas y, por consiguiente, tuvieron infrutescencias más pequeñas. Un patrón similar se observó en A. comosus, que tuvo menor rendimiento, menor tamaño de fruto promedio y mayor porcentaje de frutos quemados por el sol en monocultivos que cuando se realizó cultivo intercalado con mandioca, que le hizo sombra (Custódio et al 2016). Para otras especies existen patrones diferentes según el área de estudio.…”
Section: Efectos Del Ambiente Lumínicounclassified