2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.hna.2016.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moretti's Shock-Fitting Methods on Structured and Unstructured Meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an overview of front-tracking methods, see [47]. For an overview of Moretti's shock-fitting methods, see [48].…”
Section: Alternative Methods For Shock Capturing-front-tracking Metho...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For an overview of front-tracking methods, see [47]. For an overview of Moretti's shock-fitting methods, see [48].…”
Section: Alternative Methods For Shock Capturing-front-tracking Metho...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…j−1/2 )/∆x. If a numerical example can be found where (48) does not hold, then clearly, KEP cannot hold. If (48) seems to hold numerically, the test is inconclusive.…”
Section: Kinetic Energy-preserving (Kep) Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow conditions on the upper boundary are set to represent the accurate movement of the shock wave. In all following simulations, physical time is 0.2s , 0.6 CFL  , block max level is 2 with refinement ratio (4,2) . The initial condition of primitive state variables is The first group of experiments is to test the parallel scalability of the current AMR code.…”
Section: Double Mach Reflection Of a Strong Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of a shock-fitting method is its accuracy in smooth regions and saving of computational cost. On the other hand, the location of a discontinuity in three-dimensional flows containing complex interactions is not easy to find which restricts the application of shock-fitting methods [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the criteria suggested in literature (Marshall, 2003) Gustaffson et al (1991) for all flow solvers using adaptive techniques. As recent studies surveyed (Gustaffson et al, 1991;Désidéri et al, 1991;De Zeeuw and Powell, 1993;Balakrishnan and Yousuf, 2017;Satofuka et al, 1993;Bonfiglioli et al, 2016) currently proposed, solution-adapted Cartesian technique was not used for viscous flow. However, the geometric and solution-adaptive Cartesian grid solution techniques not only help to accelerate the solution, but also ensure that the residuals are kept at low levels, that are, increasing the accuracy of the solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%