2012
DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2012.666004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo single-cell dosimetry of I-131, I-125 and I-123 for targeted radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma

Abstract: The present dosimetric analysis shows that biological half-life, subcellular localization, and the proper account of low-energy electrons is critical in assessing the energy deposition inside the targeted cells from the three iodide radioisotopes examined. From a dosimetric point of view and under the present approximations (123)I might be superior to the other two radioiodides in the treatment of microscopic disease in B-cell lymphoma patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Such early damage predictions require an accurate modeling of the track structures of particles in the biological medium. [17][18][19] Over the last decades, the application of Monte Carlo radiation transport modeling in the field of radiobiology has seen a distinct shift in applicable scale from tissue (millimeter) 20,21 to cellular (micron) 22,23 and, more recently, subcellular (nanometer) [24][25][26] investigations. To ensure the accuracy at these new length scales of interest, it is important to simulate secondary electrons down to the excitation (or ionization) threshold of the medium, which is in the 7-10 eV range for liquid water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Such early damage predictions require an accurate modeling of the track structures of particles in the biological medium. [17][18][19] Over the last decades, the application of Monte Carlo radiation transport modeling in the field of radiobiology has seen a distinct shift in applicable scale from tissue (millimeter) 20,21 to cellular (micron) 22,23 and, more recently, subcellular (nanometer) [24][25][26] investigations. To ensure the accuracy at these new length scales of interest, it is important to simulate secondary electrons down to the excitation (or ionization) threshold of the medium, which is in the 7-10 eV range for liquid water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, differences between the convolution integral and the Monte Carlo results were up to 50% for the largest sphere (radius 1 μm), increasing further for smaller spheres. Bousis et al (Bousis, 2011;Bousis et al, 2012Bousis et al, , 2010 have tabulated cellular S-values using their home-made Monte Carlo code (MC4) for various Auger-emitting radionuclides, reporting good agreement ( $ 10%) with MIRD for S(C'C), S (C'CS) and S(N'N) but poor agreement ( $ 50%) for S(N'Cy) and S(N'CS) (C: cell, CS: cell surface, N: nucleus, Cy: cytoplasm). Champion et al (2008) used the Monte Carlo code CELLDOSE to calculate S-values in water spheres with radius from 50 nm to 2.5 mm for I-131.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 Additionally, multiple studies have highlighted the need for dosimetry in smaller follicular lymphomas (down tõ 10 µm). [63][64][65] Our study did not extend to the biggest/smallest of the follicular lymphomas. It is expected that, with the increasing/decreasing size of the tumor model, radionuclides with higher (e.g., 90 Y)/lower (e.g., 125 I) penetration emissions, would become more favored from a dosimetric perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, in clinical routine, the size of the diagnosed follicular lymphomas ranges from a few millimeters to several centimeters 62 . Additionally, multiple studies have highlighted the need for dosimetry in smaller follicular lymphomas (down to ~10 µm) 63–65 . Our study did not extend to the biggest/smallest of the follicular lymphomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%