2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-020-00770-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monosynaptic inference via finely-timed spikes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell type classification Spike waveform (width and asymmetry), autocorrelation properties, and mean firing rate (mean inter-spike interval) were used to classify neurons into excitatory cells and interneurons. The autocorrelation was parameterized with a double exponential model (Platkiewicz et al, 2021):…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell type classification Spike waveform (width and asymmetry), autocorrelation properties, and mean firing rate (mean inter-spike interval) were used to classify neurons into excitatory cells and interneurons. The autocorrelation was parameterized with a double exponential model (Platkiewicz et al, 2021):…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is instructional to assess whether the temporal cellular-level interactions uncovered by DyNetCP are bringing new latent dimensions to the analysis of neural code. Dimensionality reduction methods 18,34,35 are often used to estimate the number of independent dimensions of the code that can better explain the variability of spike trains. When principal component (PC) dimensionality reduction 30 is applied to the dynamic weights W dyn of all valid pairs (i.e., passed through all 3 thresholds, Fig.S8) in a single animal (65 units, 105 pairs, session 831882777), up to 33 components are required to account for 95% of the variance (Fig.5C, black).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were many possible sources for the lack of reliability and specificity, such as large fluctuations produced by external signals or higher-order interactions among neurons. Over the years, there have been many attempts to minimize the presence of such spurious connections, by shuffling spike trains [2], by jittering spike times [3][4][5][6], or by taking fluctuating inputs into account [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. These, in general, helped eliminate the FPs, but they then tended to be conservative, giving rise to false negatives (FNs), i.e., missing existing connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%