2011
DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2010.2060348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolithically Patterned Wide–Narrow–Wide All-Graphene Devices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2a shows the quantum capacitance of a N = 7 GNR as a function of the relative position of the Fermi level, i.e., E C -E F where E C is the conduction band edge and E F is the Fermi level, calculated using the expressions from the Appendix for the 1D-3D cases. We have, as in all simulations in the present work, taken the first two subbands with a subband separation of 0.4 eV [43] into account, assumed GNRs with n-type conductivity, modeled the residual electron concentration by assuming a homogeneous n-type doping of the GNR of 2ˆ10 20 cm´3 which corresponds to an electron sheet density of 7ˆ10 12 cm´2, and used a relative dielectric constant of 1.8 for the GNR. It can be seen from Figure 2a that the quantum capacitance for the 1D case can easily exceed C q assuming 3D conditions by one order of magnitude due to the huge qualitative and quantitative differences between the 1D and 3D densities of state.…”
Section: Modeling the Density Of States And Quantum Capacitance Of 1dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2a shows the quantum capacitance of a N = 7 GNR as a function of the relative position of the Fermi level, i.e., E C -E F where E C is the conduction band edge and E F is the Fermi level, calculated using the expressions from the Appendix for the 1D-3D cases. We have, as in all simulations in the present work, taken the first two subbands with a subband separation of 0.4 eV [43] into account, assumed GNRs with n-type conductivity, modeled the residual electron concentration by assuming a homogeneous n-type doping of the GNR of 2ˆ10 20 cm´3 which corresponds to an electron sheet density of 7ˆ10 12 cm´2, and used a relative dielectric constant of 1.8 for the GNR. It can be seen from Figure 2a that the quantum capacitance for the 1D case can easily exceed C q assuming 3D conditions by one order of magnitude due to the huge qualitative and quantitative differences between the 1D and 3D densities of state.…”
Section: Modeling the Density Of States And Quantum Capacitance Of 1dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, its narrow stripes with widths less than 100 nm, known as graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), are quasi-one-dimensional materials exhibiting finite energy gaps [3]. Because of their excellent electrical and mechanical properties and their ease of orientation during synthesis, GNRs have demonstrated their potential as important material in electronic applications, specifically as the channel for transistors [4][5][6][7][8]. In recent years, the fabrication of a 100 GHz transistor from Wafer-Scale Epitaxial graphene [9], as well as a high-mobility GNR-FET operating at low voltage at room temperature [10] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11b. The rest of the graphene-metal contacts are Ohmic to ensure proper operation and this is achieved by using wide GNRs [Unluer et al 2011]. Both Schottky diode and sleep-FET receive the same restore signal.…”
Section: Physical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%