2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Findings from the Vaccine Safety Datalink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
155
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk intervals were chosen based on previous studies, 8,20,23,24 CDC input, and expert opinion. Similar to previous vaccine safety studies that focused resources on statistically significant outcomes, 16,[25][26][27][28] …”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The risk intervals were chosen based on previous studies, 8,20,23,24 CDC input, and expert opinion. Similar to previous vaccine safety studies that focused resources on statistically significant outcomes, 16,[25][26][27][28] …”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Data have shown that prophylactic HPV vaccination is generally safe and well tolerated. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The median age of sexual debut is in the late teens (15-19 years) in most countries. 39 Virginal adolescents (#15 years old) were not included in HPV vaccine efficacy evaluations because of low HPV exposure and ethical constraints.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used generally accepted risk windows in vaccine safety studies on the basis of biological plausibility so that the results could be compared with other studies. 16 Fourth, for non-CRC reviewed events, medical records were further reviewed only when there was a statistically significant increased risk. acquisition of data; Dr Jacobsen contributed to the conception and design of the study and conduct of the study; and all authors approved the fi nal manuscript as submitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%