Monitoring the Intended and Perceived Training Load of a Professional Futsal Team Over 45 Weeks

Rabelo, Felipe Nunes; Pasquarelli, Bruno Natale; Gonçalves, Bruno; Matzenbacher, Fernando; Campos, Fábio Angioluci Diniz; Sampaio, Jaime; Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo

doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000001090

Cited by 35 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it is likely that the number of players and coaches diverges in player-coach studies in team sports. 8,10,27 …”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7 In general, a poor relationship between planned and actual training load is reported with a general tendency of coaches to overestimate training load. [8][9][10] More specific, it appears that coaches underestimate player load in low intensity training and overestimate in high intensity training sessions. 10,11 Knowledge of match exertion can help plan the training sessions but this is not yet known.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impaired Player–Coach Perceptions of Exertion and Recovery During Match Congestion

Doeven¹,

Brink²,

Frencken³

et al. 2017

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During intensified phases of competition, attunement of exertion and recovery is crucial to maintain performance. Although a mismatch between coach' and players' perceptions of training load is demonstrated, it is unknown if these discrepancies also exist for match exertion and recovery. Purpose: The aims of this study are to determine match exertion, subsequent recovery and to investigate to what extent the coach is able to estimate players' match exertion and recovery. Methods: Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and Total quality of recovery (TQR) of 14 professional basketball players (age 26.7±3.8 y, height 197.2±9.1 cm, weight 100.3±15.2 kg, body fat 10.3±3.6 %) were compared with observations of the coach.During an in-season phase of 15 matches within 6 weeks, players gave RPE after each match.TQR scores were filled out before the first training session after the match. The coach rated observed exertion (ROE) and recovery (TQ-OR) of the players. Results: RPE was lower than ROE (15.6±2.3 and 16.1±1.4; p=0.029). Furthermore, TQR was lower than TQ-OR (12.7±3.0 and 15.3±1.3; p<0.001). Correlations between coach' and players' exertion and recovery were r=.25 and r=.21, respectively. For recovery within 1 day the correlation was r=.68 but for recovery after 1-2 days no association existed. Conclusion: Players perceive match exertion hard to very hard and subsequent recovery reasonable. The coach overestimates match exertion and underestimates degree of recovery. Correspondence between coach and players is thus not optimal. This mismatch potentially leads to inadequate planning of training sessions and performance decrease during fixture congestion in basketball.

show abstract

“…However, it is likely that the number of players and coaches diverges in player-coach studies in team sports. 8,10,27 …”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impaired Player–Coach Perceptions of Exertion and Recovery During Match Congestion

Doeven¹,

Brink²,

Frencken³

et al. 2017

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The high effect size found also stands out, which reveals great probability of this fact to be true for tae-kwon-do male athletes. Studies have pointed to the potentiation of the ability of repeated sprints in athletes after a gradual reduction of the training volume 23,24 . Mujika et al 8 reported that the reduction in the training volume leads to an increase in muscle glycogen stores, which, in turn, increase the time that athletes support being at high-intensity physical exercises.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efeito de um período de polimento na potência e capacidade anaeróbia de atletas de tae-kwon-do

Fortes

Vasconcelos

Santos

et al. 2017

Rev. Bras. Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n2p224 The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of a tapering period on anaerobic power and capacity of tae-kwon-do athletes. Thirty-one male tae-kwon-do participants of the Brazilian Championship were selected in a non-probabilistic way. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, namely: experimental group (EG, n = 15) and control group (CG, n = 17). Both groups followed the same training protocol up to the tapering stage. CG was submitted to training loads contained in the last two weeks of the macrocycle. Only EG was submitted to tapering. Tapering had 2 weeks duration, adopting the linear tapering method. Taekwondo Anaerobic Test was performed by athletes before the start of the season, which was named as pre-intervention, and the last week of each mesocycle [Prep I, Prep II and Tapering (only EG)]. Group vs. time effect interaction (p < 0.01) was identified for alactic anaerobic power, with an increase only in EG in tapering (p = 0.01). A significant group vs. time interaction (p <0.01) was revealed to fatigue index, improved anaerobic capacity being checked in EG only after the tapering period (p = 0.01). It was concluded that two weeks of linear type tapering optimized the anaerobic power and capacity of male tae-kwon-do athletes.

show abstract

“…4 Several studies have investigated differences between loads planned by coaches and perceived by athletes, which has demonstrated a lack of correspondence between this loads for individual and team sports. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In team sports, such as soccer, this inconsistency is even bigger, due to the fact that training load it is harder to control during group exercises. 7 In a study that aimed to examine this relation, over the course of 45 weeks during a season, divided into four periods, has found that sessions with a high demand of the training load, the coach's session ratings of perceived exertion (s-RPE) was overestimated when compared to the athletes' s-RPE, during the four periods of the season.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They also observed differences for light and moderate loads in the preseason period and competitive period 2, respectively. 5 Brink, et al 7 investigated the relation between s-RPE during the competitive season among Under-17 and Under-19 soccer players, and found that these young athletes considered the training harder than the coach (p <0.001), which in turn could promote certain negative adaptations from training. However, more recently Redkva, da Silva, Paes & dos Santos 12 did not found differences in s-RPE between players and coaches (p = 0.70), as well as no statistical differences when comparing the s-RPE prescribed by coaches and perceived by athletes (p>0.05) in the different types of training proposed during the preseason period.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coaches’ and Young soccer players' training load perceptions during different training phases

Figueiredo

Manoel

et al. 2019

Rev And Med Dep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To our Knowledge, information about the agreement between coaches’ and the young soccer players’ session rating of perceived exertion is not consistent during specific periods of training (intensification and taper) and has not been established. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the internal training load and session rating of perceived exertion between coaches’ and young soccer players’ during three weeks in different training phases. Method: Participants were 16 male elite Under19 soccer players and their coaches. Before each training session, the coaches reported a session rating of perceived exertion using the Borg CR-10 scale as well as the planned duration (min) of the training based on prior planning, while the athletes responded the scale after each training session. Results: No differences in intensity session rating of perceived exertion (t = 0.49; p = 0.62) and training load (t = 0.18; p = 0.86) were observed between coaches and players during the training period analyzed. During different training phases, no significant differences were found during intensification (t = 0.18; p = 0.85) and taper (t = -0.19; p = 0.85) in training loads and in the session rating of perceived exertion prescribed by coaches and perceived by players. A very large correlation was observed between coaches training load (r= 0.84) and players training load. However, a trivial correlation was found between players training load and changes in the Yo-yo IR1 performance (r= -0.09), age (r= -0.06) and years of competitive experience (r= -0.08). Stepwise linear regression revealed that coaches training load (F1; 238= 582.7; R2= 0.710; p<0.001) explained 71% of the variance in players training load. Conclusion: The results suggest that the session rating of perceived exertion and training load prescribed during three weeks in different training phases (by coaches) was not different from perceived by young soccer players. Moreover, coaches training load seem to be effective to predict the training load in soccer players.

show abstract

Monitoring the Intended and Perceived Training Load of a Professional Futsal Team Over 45 Weeks

Cited by 35 publications

References 26 publications

Impaired Player–Coach Perceptions of Exertion and Recovery During Match Congestion

Impaired Player–Coach Perceptions of Exertion and Recovery During Match Congestion

Efeito de um período de polimento na potência e capacidade anaeróbia de atletas de tae-kwon-do

Coaches’ and Young soccer players' training load perceptions during different training phases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About