2005
DOI: 10.1190/1.2149620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring primary depletion reservoirs using amplitudes and time shifts from high-repeat seismic surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1988, Dussealt et al 1993, Bruno and Bilak 1994, Castillo et al 1997, Massonnet et al 1997, Fielding et al 1998, Mossop and Segall 1999, Vasco et al 2000a, Stancliffe and van der Kooij 2001, Schmidt and Burgmann 2003, Vasco and Ferretti 2005 or by timelapse seismic monitoring (Guilbot and Smith 2002, Landro and Stammeijer 2004, Tura et al 2005, Hall 2006, Roste et al 2006, Rickett et al 2007, Staples et al 2007 to constrain volume and fluid pressure changes within a reservoir. Our analysis assumes that a set of deformation measurements have been gathered.…”
Section: Estimating Volume and Pressure Changes Within The Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1988, Dussealt et al 1993, Bruno and Bilak 1994, Castillo et al 1997, Massonnet et al 1997, Fielding et al 1998, Mossop and Segall 1999, Vasco et al 2000a, Stancliffe and van der Kooij 2001, Schmidt and Burgmann 2003, Vasco and Ferretti 2005 or by timelapse seismic monitoring (Guilbot and Smith 2002, Landro and Stammeijer 2004, Tura et al 2005, Hall 2006, Roste et al 2006, Rickett et al 2007, Staples et al 2007 to constrain volume and fluid pressure changes within a reservoir. Our analysis assumes that a set of deformation measurements have been gathered.…”
Section: Estimating Volume and Pressure Changes Within The Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies utilized geodetic data, such as leveling measurements, in order to quantify surface deformation related to fluid production or injection. Currently, time-lapse seismic surveys are providing additional deformation measurements, distributed throughout the overburden (Guilbot and Smith 2002, Landro and Stammeijer 2004, Tura et al 2005, Hatchell and Bourne 2005, Barkved and Kristiansen 2005, Hall 2006, Roste et al 2006, Rickett et al 2007, Staples et al 2007). Recently, the observed deformation has been used to better understand fluid flow and the heterogeneity of flow properties within the reservoir (Vasco et al 2000a, Vasco et al 2001, Du et al 2005, Vasco and Ferretti 2005, Hodgson et al 2007, Vasco et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InSAR observations may be used to image fluid-induced deformation over regions tens to hundreds of square kilometers in extent (Fielding et al 1998, Galloway et al 1998, Amelung et al 1999, Hoffmann et al 2001, Schmidt and Burgmann 2003, Colesanti et al 2003, Vasco and Ferretti 2005. Second, recent developments in the processing of time-lapse seismic data allow for estimates of deformation in the overburden and within the reservoir (Guilbot and Smith 2002, Landro and Stammeijer 2004, Tura et al 2005, Hatchell and Bourne 2005, Barkved and Kristiansen 2005, Hall 2006, Roste et al 2006, Staples et al 2007, Hawkins et al 2007). Such estimates offer high resolution, three-dimensional sampling of deformation over a producing reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landrø and Stammeijer (2004), Røste et al (2006), and Ghaderi and Landrø (2009) present different methods to estimate reservoir thickness variations from velocity changes, using differences in seismic amplitudes and time-shifts. Tura et al (2005) use a closed-loop workflow in which the static and dynamic reservoir model properties are updated with the objective of matching production data, time-lapse seismic amplitudes, and time-shifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%