Since October 1996, Statoil and its Sleipner partners have injected CO 2 into a saline aquifer, the Utsira Sand, at a depth of approximately 1000 m. The aquifer has a thickness of more than 200 m near the injection site and is sealed by thick shales. A multi-institutional research project SACS (Saline Aquifer CO 2 Storage) was formed to predict and monitor the migration of the injected CO 2 . To this end two time-lapse seismic surveys over the injection area have been acquired, one in October 1999 after 2.3 million tonnes of CO 2 had been injected and the second in October 2001 after approximately 4.4 million tonnes of CO 2 had been injected. Comparison with the base seismic survey of 1994 prior to injection provides insights into the development of the CO 2 plume. In this paper some selected results of the seismic interpretation of the CO 2 plume at the two different time-steps will be shown.
Summary In preparation for the SPE Applied Technology Workshop (ATW) held in Brugge in June 2008, a unique benchmark project was organized to test the combined use of waterflooding-optimization and history-matching methods in a closed-loop workflow. The benchmark was organized in the form of an interactive competition during the months preceding the ATW. The goal set for the exercise was to create a set of history-matched reservoir models and then to find an optimal waterflooding strategy for an oil field containing 20 producers and 10 injectors that can each be controlled by three inflow-control valves (ICVs). A synthetic data set was made available to the participants by TNO, consisting of well-log data, the structure of the reservoir, 10 years of production data, inverted time-lapse seismic data, and other information necessary for the exercise. The parameters to be estimated during the history match were permeability, porosity, and net-to gross- (NTG) thickness ratio. The optimized production strategy was tested on a synthetic truth model developed by TNO, which was also used to generate the production data and inverted time-lapse seismic. Because of time and practical constraints, a full closed-loop exercise was not possible; however, the participants could obtain the response to their production strategy after 10 years, update their models, and resubmit a revised production strategy for the final 10 years of production. In total, nine groups participated in the exercise. The spread of the net present value (NPV) obtained by the different participants is on the order of 10%. The highest result that was obtained is only 3% below the optimized case determined for the known truth field. Although not an objective of this exercise, it was shown that the increase in NPV as a result of having three control intervals per well instead of one was considerable (approximately 20%). The results also showed that the NPV achieved with the flooding strategy that was updated after additional production data became available was consistently higher than before the data became available.
CO2produced at the Sleipner natural gas field is being injected into the Utsira Sand, a major saline aquifer. Time-lapse seismic data were acquired in 1999 and 2001, with 2.35 and 4.26 million tonnes of CO2in the reservoir respectively. The CO2plume is imaged as a number of bright sub-horizontal reflections within the reservoir unit, growing with time, and underlain by a prominent velocity pushdown. No leakage has been detected from the repository reservoir. The reflections are interpreted as tuned responses from thin (<8 m thick) layers of CO2trapped beneath thin intra-reservoir mudstones and the reservoir caprock. However, these alone are unable to account for the amount of observed pushdown. A two-component 3D saturation model is therefore developed for the 1999 dataset, with high-saturation CO2forming the layers and a lesser component of low-saturation CO2between the layers. Saturations are calculated from the observed reflectivity and velocity pushdown and the resulting model contains 85% of the known injected mass of CO2. A 2D synthetic seismic section through the saturation model matches the observed seismic response well and the model is considered to provide an acceptable description of the CO2distribution. Signal attenuation is more pronounced within the 2001 plume and its effects are likely to become more significant with time, perhaps reducing the efficacy of seismic verification techniques as the plume grows further. Other geophysical methods, such as microgravimetry, may become increasingly useful at this stage.
The CO 2 storage operation at Sleipner in the Norwegian North Sea provides an excellent demonstration of the application of time-lapse surface seismic methods to CO 2 plume monitoring under favourable conditions. Injection commenced at Sleipner in 1996 with CO 2 separated from natural gas being injected into the Utsira Sand, a major saline aquifer of late Cenozoic age. CO 2 injection is via a near-horizontal well, at a depth of about 1012 m bsl, some 200 m below the reservoir top, at a rate approaching 1 million tonnes (Mt) per year, with more than 11 Mt currently stored.A comprehensive time-lapse surface seismic programme has been carried out, with 3D surveys in 1994, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008. Key aims of the seismic monitoring are to track plume migration, demonstrate containment within the storage reservoir and provide quantitative information as a means to better understand detailed flow processes controlling development of the plume in the reservoir.The CO 2 plume is imaged as a number of bright sub-horizontal reflections within the reservoir, growing with time ( Figure 1). The reflections mostly comprise tuned wavelets arising from thin (mostly < 8 m thick) layers of CO 2 trapped beneath very thin intra-reservoir mudstones and the reservoir caprock. The plume is roughly 200 m high and elliptical in plan, with a major axis increasing to over 3000 m by 2008. As well as its prominent reflectivity, the plume also produces a large velocity pushdown caused by the seismic waves travelling more slowly through CO 2 -saturated rock than through the virgin aquifer. This paper summarises some of the quantitative methods that have been applied to the Sleipner seismic datasets.
At the Sleipner fields in the North Sea, CO2 is being injected into sands of the Miocene-Pliocene Utsira Formation, which is overlain by thick Pliocene shales. The highly porous (35%–40%) and extremely permeable (approximately 2 D) Utsira sands are organized into approximately 30 m thick packages. These packages are separated by thin (predominantly 1 m thick), low-permeability shale layers, which are assumed to contain potential fluid pathways of erosive or deformational origin. A 6.5 m thick shale layer close to the top of the sands separates an eastward thickening sand wedge from the main sand package below. Migration simulations indicate that the migration pattern of CO2 below the shale layer would differ strongly from that within the sand wedge above. Time-lapse seismic data acquired prior to the start, and after three years, of injection confirmed a reservoir model based on these findings and showed that the thin shale layers act as temporary barriers and that the 6.5 m thick shale layer does not fully inhibit upward migration of CO2.
C02 produced at the Sleipner field is being injected into the Utsira Sand, a major saline aquifer. Time-lapse seismic data acquired in 1999, with 2.35 million tonnes of C02 in the reservoir, image the C02, plume as a number of bright sub-horizontal reflections. These are interpreted as tuned responses from thin (< 8 m thick) layers of C02 trapped beneath intra-reservoir shales. A prominent vertical 'chimney' of C02 appears to be the principal feeder of these layers in the upper part of the reservoir. Amplitude-thickness scaling for each layer, followed by a layer summation, indicates that roughly 80% of the total injected C02 is concentrated in the layers. The remainder is interpreted to occupy the feeder 'chimneys' and dispersed clouds between the layers. A prominent velocity pushdown is evident beneath the C02 accumulations. Velocity estimation using the Gassmann relationships suggests that the observed pushdown cannot readily be explained by C02 present only at high saturations in the thin layers; a minor proportion of low saturation C02 is also required. This is consistent with the layer volume summation, but significant uncertainty remains.
The growing emissions of greenhouse gases, especially CO 2, are seen worldwide as one of the major causes of climate change. International treaties like the Kyoto Protocol are supposed to contribute to reducing the emission of greenhouse gases. Underground sequestration has the potential to play an important role in keeping large volumes of CO 2 from escaping into the atmosphere in the short term. The first case of industrial scale CO 2 storage in the world (close to one million tonnes per year since 1996) is taking place at the Sleipner underground CO 2 storage site in the North Sea offshore Norway. Careful monitoring of the behaviour of the storage facility is required to establish its safety. To this end, two time-lapse seismic surveys have been acquired; the first repeat survey was completed in October 1999 and the second in October 2001. The presence of CO 2 beneath thin intra-shale layers within the reservoir has caused significant changes both in reflection amplitudes (up to a factor 10) and in travel time (more than 40ms) through the CO 2 plume (the velocity pushdown effect). Some aspects of the interpretation of these time-lapse seismic surveys will be presented here.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.