2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2007.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of field isolates and vaccine strains of infectious bursal disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The serological results detected viral antigen in the bursa at the early stages of the infection. The RT-PCR/RFLP pattern was used for differential pathotyping of the isolates (15,18 In immunosupression test GMT HI titers of the vaccinated and the control groups were calculated 5.07 vs 5.14 and no significant difference was found between them. The B:B index was estimated 1.14 following vaccination with the developed IBD live vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The serological results detected viral antigen in the bursa at the early stages of the infection. The RT-PCR/RFLP pattern was used for differential pathotyping of the isolates (15,18 In immunosupression test GMT HI titers of the vaccinated and the control groups were calculated 5.07 vs 5.14 and no significant difference was found between them. The B:B index was estimated 1.14 following vaccination with the developed IBD live vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are also in correspondence with Shoshtari et al (2004), who reported the presence of single RE site for StuI in vvIBDV. Juneja et al (2008) also reported that StuI restriction site was present only in vvIBDV and not found in vaccine strains.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Paula et al (2004) reported that an amino acid substitution was observed in the SspI site in non-vvIBDV strains. Juneja et al (2008) reported the presence of SspI restriction enzyme site in all the fi eld isolates and not in vaccine strain (Lin et al, 1993;Hoque et al, 2001). Th e vvIBDV isolates, 88180 and HK46 did not have site for SspI (Eterradossi et al, 1999;Lim et al, 1999).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infectious bursal disease virus has two serotypes; however, only serotype I viruses are naturally pathogenic to chickens [12]- [13]. Serotype I strains are classified as very virulent IBDV strains, classic or variant and differ in their virulent, antigenic, and pathogenic properties [14]- [15]. A second serotype (serotype II), isolated from a fowl, turkeys, and ducks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%