2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:ejpp.0000032397.65710.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and Morphological Diversity of Fusarium Species in Finland and North-Western Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analysis of F. avenaceum strains from different regions of Russia using the PHO gene sequences showed four of them to form an independent cluster phylogenetically closer to F. torulosum, than to F. avenaceum, which is conventionally called F. avenaceum-V. Perhaps this group of strains can be treated as a separate phylogenetic species, but this fact has not been confirmed in the analysis of other markers and requires further study. At the same time, we have not found a correlation between the phylogeny of the strains and their division into conventional groups I and II proposed by T. Yli-Mattila et al [31,38]. Moreover, these markers did not allow to identify F. arthrosporioides strain as a separate taxa other than F. avenaceum, thereby confirming the hypothesis that F. arthrosporioides is not a separate species.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Phylogenetic analysis of F. avenaceum strains from different regions of Russia using the PHO gene sequences showed four of them to form an independent cluster phylogenetically closer to F. torulosum, than to F. avenaceum, which is conventionally called F. avenaceum-V. Perhaps this group of strains can be treated as a separate phylogenetic species, but this fact has not been confirmed in the analysis of other markers and requires further study. At the same time, we have not found a correlation between the phylogeny of the strains and their division into conventional groups I and II proposed by T. Yli-Mattila et al [31,38]. Moreover, these markers did not allow to identify F. arthrosporioides strain as a separate taxa other than F. avenaceum, thereby confirming the hypothesis that F. arthrosporioides is not a separate species.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The DNA quality of each strain was confirmed by using ITS1/ITS4 primers [26]. The species-specific primer pair PfusF/FlanR for F. langsethiae [4] was used in PCR reactions. The primers CNL12/PulvIGS [3] were used to distinguish two F. langsethiae IGS-subgroups based on the PCR product sizes.…”
Section: Dna Isolation and Pcr Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, molecular methods used in combination with traditional morphological methods revealed that F. langsethiae resembles F. poae, F. sporotrichioides and F. sibiricum phylogenetically [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Fusarium diversity after Pichia treatment was not analyzed in this study, and therefore we cannot conclude which speciWc species were inhibited during malting. In Finland, the most common Fusarium species in barley during the recent years have been F. avenaceum, F. athrosporioides, F. sporotrichioides, and F. culmorum [72]. Our further studies will be directed toward investigating the eVect of biocontrol yeasts on Fusarium diversity during processing.…”
Section: B)mentioning
confidence: 99%