2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified gravityN-body code comparison project

Abstract: Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.P… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

22
138
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
22
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…smaller (comparable to the discrepancies in the predictions of different modified gravity simulation codes [46]). The same method, however, does not work as accurately in chameleontype models (see Appendix A), the simulations for which are much more expensive than those for the Vainshtein-type models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…smaller (comparable to the discrepancies in the predictions of different modified gravity simulation codes [46]). The same method, however, does not work as accurately in chameleontype models (see Appendix A), the simulations for which are much more expensive than those for the Vainshtein-type models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Using the generic parametrisation for modified gravity theories [39,40], ECOSMOG was extended to incorporate chameleon, dilaton and symmetron models [41,42] in general. ECOS-MOG has recently been compared with other codes developed subsequently, including MG-GADGET [43], Isis [44] and MG-ENZO [45] and very good agreement was found between all these codes [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The code that this paper is based on is a slight modification of ISIS ), which in turn is a modification of the RAMSES hydrodynamic N-body code (Teyssier 2002). See also Zhao et al (2011), Li et al (2012a), Oyaizu et al (2008, Mota et al (2008), Boehmer et al (2010), Zumalacarregui et al (2013), Puchwein et al (2013) for other codes that have implemented and performed simulations of f (R) gravity and Winther et al (2015) for a recent code comparison between these codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-static solver was already applied to symmetron and disformal gravity models Hagala et al 2016). A comparison between the accuracy of this code and other codes that solve the same set of equations can be found in Winther et al (2015).…”
Section: The N-body Codementioning
confidence: 99%