2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing scalar tensor theories for gravity in redshift space

Abstract: We present measurements of the spatial clustering statistics in redshift space of various scalar field modified gravity simulations. We utilise the two-point and three-point correlation functions to quantify the spatial distribution of dark matter halos within these simulations and thus discriminate between the models. We compare Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) simulations to various modified gravity scenarios and find consistency with previous work in terms of two-point statistics in real and redshift space. Howeve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the scale-dependent growth rates predict an enhancement in the redshift-space clustering in f (R) models, this is only seen at relatively small scales, x < 20 h −1 Mpc (x < 50 h −1 Mpc in F4). At these small scales, we will find deviations from linear theory due to the effect of virial motions, and one should take into account the predicted enhanced peculiar velocities in MOG models (Zu et al 2014;Hellwing et al 2014;Sabiu et al 2016). That means that, in order to use the growth rate inferred from galaxy redshift catalogues to constrain this class of models, it is necessary to model these effects in detail, and to test the analysis method with realistic MOG mocks (Barreira et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the scale-dependent growth rates predict an enhancement in the redshift-space clustering in f (R) models, this is only seen at relatively small scales, x < 20 h −1 Mpc (x < 50 h −1 Mpc in F4). At these small scales, we will find deviations from linear theory due to the effect of virial motions, and one should take into account the predicted enhanced peculiar velocities in MOG models (Zu et al 2014;Hellwing et al 2014;Sabiu et al 2016). That means that, in order to use the growth rate inferred from galaxy redshift catalogues to constrain this class of models, it is necessary to model these effects in detail, and to test the analysis method with realistic MOG mocks (Barreira et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing interest in extending RSD studies to smaller scales as a test of modified gravity and interacting dark energy models (e.g. Jennings et al 2012;Marulli et al 2012;Hellwing et al 2014;Taruya et al 2014;Zu et al 2014;Xu 2015;Barreira et al 2016;Sabiu et al 2016;Arnalte-Mur et al 2017). These future developments provide the main motivation for our work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing studies seek to go beyond the 2-point statistics explored methods like the 3-point statistics (Sabiu et al 2016;Slepian et al 2017), the 4-point statistics (Sabiu et al 2019), the density field or voids (Ryden 1995;Sutter et al 2012;Bos et al 2012;Chan et al 2014;Cai et al 2015;Sutter et al 2014;Mao et al 2017;Ramanah et al 2019;Hamaus et al 2020;Lavaux & Jasche 2021), the Minkowski functionals (Minkowski 1903;Mecke et al 1994;Schmalzing & Gorski 1998;Kerscher et al 1998;Park & Kim 2010;Appleby et al 2020Appleby et al , 2021a, deep learning (Ravanbakhsh et al 2017;Mathuriya et al 2018;He et al 2019;Ntampaka et al 2019;Pan et al 2020;Li et al 2020;Mao et al 2021;Villaescusa-Navarro et al 2021;Ni et al 2021;Wu et al 2021), and so on. While all of them can explore the non-Gaussian clustering information encoded in the LSS, in this analysis we investigate a statistical tool namely the mark weighted correlation function (MCF; Beisbart & Kerscher 2000;Beisbart et al 2002;Gottlöber et al 2002;Sheth & Tormen 2004;Sheth et al 2005;Skibba et al 2006;White & Padmanabhan 2009;Satpathy et al 2019;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%