Non-Crimp Fabric Composites 2011
DOI: 10.1533/9780857092533.2.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the deformability of biaxial non-crimp fabric composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any small misalignment will produce tensile or compressive forces in the fiber directions, and as a consequence, a large scatter in the measured force readings will appear [ 21 ]. However, the first shear cycle for fabrics showed extremely irregular behavior and evidence of tension in the fibers in the frame [ 19 ]; this type of behavior was labeled in [ 19 , 34 ] as ‘bad tests’, and normally, such tests were discarded from the data processing. In addition, when repeating the test for the same fabric, we came up with some extreme irregular cases from the general trend, which were not included in the analysis in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any small misalignment will produce tensile or compressive forces in the fiber directions, and as a consequence, a large scatter in the measured force readings will appear [ 21 ]. However, the first shear cycle for fabrics showed extremely irregular behavior and evidence of tension in the fibers in the frame [ 19 ]; this type of behavior was labeled in [ 19 , 34 ] as ‘bad tests’, and normally, such tests were discarded from the data processing. In addition, when repeating the test for the same fabric, we came up with some extreme irregular cases from the general trend, which were not included in the analysis in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first uses 3-D geometries of a variety of levels of difficulty in forming in an attempt to define some practical forming limit, with the most commonly used trial geometry being a hemisphere, although more practically based work tended to use a wider range of geometries (Wang et al, 1999). between non-crimp and standard woven fabrics) that do not show up well in the more standardised tests for in-plane deformations (Harrison et al, 2011). Its advantage lies in that it can at best capture not just the level of deformation but also how practically difficult it is to develop that deformation in a controlled and 100 mm Figure 5.2 Mapping tows to 3-D geometry.…”
Section: Fundamental Deformation Modes Of Composites Reinforcementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of numerical approaches to model the complex behavior of NCFs represents an attractive method to understand and predict their deformation behavior. Predictive models can be implementedas proposed by Harrison et al [12] in order to reduce costly and time-intensive material characterization. Moreover, they enable to study the influence of manufacturing process parameters in a wide range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%