2005
DOI: 10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.01919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of a Diesel Engine Common Rail Injection System

Abstract: This paper is devoted to the modelling of a Diesel Common Rail Injection System. The objective is twofold : to build a simulator which will be used later for the rail pressure control scheme validation, and to get linearized models for control design. A mathematical model, based on physical equations is developed and used as a simulator. Then time responses of the rail pressure of a real engine and of the simulator are compared in order to check the accuracy of the model. A frequency domain approach is finally… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, only the more significant characteristics can be taken into account leaving most secondary effects un-described mathematically. In this way, without losing essential validity, the injection system can be represented by ordinary differential equations (ODE) (Aespy, Engja, & Skarboe, 1996;Desantes, Arregle, & Rodriguez, 1999;Fuseya, Nishimura, Sato, & Tanaka, 1999;Gauthier, Sename, Dugard, & Meissonnier, 2005;Morselli, Corti, & Rizzoni, 2002), by transfer function (Kuraoka, Ohka, & Ohba, 1989), or state-space description (Lino, Maione, & Rizzo, 2007;Maione et al, 2004). Since the simplicity is a focal point, this paper is specifically aimed at defining a simple enough control-oriented model, which at the same time ensures reliable data used to design a predictive control law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Namely, only the more significant characteristics can be taken into account leaving most secondary effects un-described mathematically. In this way, without losing essential validity, the injection system can be represented by ordinary differential equations (ODE) (Aespy, Engja, & Skarboe, 1996;Desantes, Arregle, & Rodriguez, 1999;Fuseya, Nishimura, Sato, & Tanaka, 1999;Gauthier, Sename, Dugard, & Meissonnier, 2005;Morselli, Corti, & Rizzoni, 2002), by transfer function (Kuraoka, Ohka, & Ohba, 1989), or state-space description (Lino, Maione, & Rizzo, 2007;Maione et al, 2004). Since the simplicity is a focal point, this paper is specifically aimed at defining a simple enough control-oriented model, which at the same time ensures reliable data used to design a predictive control law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The remaining subsystems, such as the IMV actuator or the HP pump, are modelled using physical equations (electrical, hydraulic and mechanical) and then linearized in a generic way to lead to LPV models. Note that the complete non linear model in Gauthier et al (2005) is a 9th-order system.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modelling Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydraulic equations based model proposed in Gauthier et al (2005) uses two physical characteristics of the rail: the volume V [m 3 ], and the bulk modulus K [Pa]. Let us recall that the bulk modulus is a fuel feature describing the behavior of the rail pressure variation against flows, i.e.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modelling Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations