2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00135-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling landscape distributions of large forest owls as applied to managing forests in north-east Victoria, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All tests were considered significant at p < 0.05. All significant variables were subsequently entered into a Pearson's correlation matrix to identify collinearities between significant variables (ie, r s ³ 0.65) (Loyn et al 2001). Variables that had collinearities were examined and the variable that explained a greater portion of the deviance was retained.…”
Section: Creation and Evaluation Of Resource Selection Function Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All tests were considered significant at p < 0.05. All significant variables were subsequently entered into a Pearson's correlation matrix to identify collinearities between significant variables (ie, r s ³ 0.65) (Loyn et al 2001). Variables that had collinearities were examined and the variable that explained a greater portion of the deviance was retained.…”
Section: Creation and Evaluation Of Resource Selection Function Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All tests were considered significant at P < 0.05. All significant variables were subsequently entered into a Pearson's correlation matrix to identify collinearities between significant variables (i.e., r s ‡ 0.65) (Loyn et al 2001). Variables that had collinearities were examined and the variable that explained a greater portion of the deviance was retained.…”
Section: Creation Of Resource Selection Function Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that finer-scaled habitat variables are unlikely to be captured at landscape level (Austin, 2002), the modelling process could involve two steps, whereby a spatially explicit model is first generated using landscape (GIS) variables, and a second model at site level is developed using fine-scale habitat variables measured on the ground (Gibson et al, 2004). Such multiscale approaches for modelling habitats are not new (Hall and Mannan, 1999;Luck, 2002), but studies involving analyses combining both GIS and on-ground variables are rare (Loyn et al, 2001;Gibson et al, 2004). Because measuring ground variables is money-and timeconsuming, despite the potential power of combining the two above steps, the first one alone is most often used for conservation planning (Gibson et al, 2004), but there are few information about the effectiveness of working only with coarse factors under a GIS option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%