2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0519-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple spatial‐scale resource selection function models in relation to human disturbance for moose in northeastern China

Abstract: The moose (Alces alces cameloides) population in northeastern China is on the southernmost edge of its distribution in Asia. A survey was conducted to determine moose resource selection and the effects of human disturbance on moose in a study area of 20,661 ha located on the northwestern slope of the Lesser Khingan Mountains, located in northeastern China. Predictive models of resource selection were developed using logistic and autologistic regression. All models considered resource variable selection at two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
2
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with previous findings on established populations in different countries of other deer species (e.g. Rowland et al 2000;Jiang et al 2006Jiang et al , 2009. Kjostvedt et al (1998) and Hewison et al (2001) found that roe deer were less abundant in areas associated with human activity and areas close to human habitation.…”
Section: Roe Deersupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are consistent with previous findings on established populations in different countries of other deer species (e.g. Rowland et al 2000;Jiang et al 2006Jiang et al , 2009. Kjostvedt et al (1998) and Hewison et al (2001) found that roe deer were less abundant in areas associated with human activity and areas close to human habitation.…”
Section: Roe Deersupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to our prediction (Prediction 1) we found that study plots where roe deer were present were positively associated with increasing distance from roads in both countries, a trend already demonstrated in Portugal (Torres et al 2011) and in different countries and for other deer species (e.g. Rowland et al 2000;Jiang et al 2009). This was expected since roads are sources of disturbance and a mortality hazard, so roe deer may avoid them because of the risk of collision, as has been shown in elk (Rowland et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Jiang et al (2007Jiang et al ( , 2009 found that moose tended to avoid areas within 3 km of roads and red-deer bedsite occurrence was affected by roads. However, there are few data on the effects of highways or railroads on the diurnal rhythm of animal activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%