2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-018-1762-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling individual tree height–diameter relationships for multi-layered and multi-species forests in central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasting mixing effects on two or more species in mixed forest stands are common among a range of forest types [9,10,13,50,51]. Our results similarly showed that species-mixing had contrasting effects between species in both the generalized h-d and basal area growth models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrasting mixing effects on two or more species in mixed forest stands are common among a range of forest types [9,10,13,50,51]. Our results similarly showed that species-mixing had contrasting effects between species in both the generalized h-d and basal area growth models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…All else being equal, dq measured the degree of inter-tree competition, and secondarily the stage of stand development [41,53,54]. Although the same variables have already been used in several h-d functions for multi-species forest [39,40,50,54], in those studies, the effects of species interactions on h-d relationships were not quantified. Here, we show that for mixed stands, the explicit evaluation of mixing proportion based on species-specific growing space requirements could be advantageous for modeling the more complex effects of the vertical structure of mixed species stands compared to pure stands.…”
Section: Influence On Species-mixing In Tree Allometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the evaluation of the eight versatile growth functions (Table 3), which we considered as base functions based on the principles of their logical behavior and suitability in the practical application. The Chapman-Richards function, which shows the best fitting performance to our data (Table 4), has enough flexibility for modelling different tree attributes, such as growth of diameter and height [68][69][70][71] and height-diameter relationship [67,72,73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where b is a vector of the fixed parameters of equations (Equations (6) and 7), u j is a vector of the random effects (u i1 , u i2 ), and x i is a vector of the predictors for i th sample plot. The elements (z ij ) of this matrix for sample trees were determined from the partial derivatives of the nonlinear models (Equations (6) and 7) with respect to the fixed parameters associated with the random effects [16,[65][66][67]. Following equations were obtained from the partial derivative solution.…”
Section: Calibrated Response or Localized Diameter Increment Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did not consider this because of computational complexity, but species-specific effects on the height-diameter relationships were included using the dummy variable modelling approach. This approach is considered suitable for modelling height-diameter relationships using the data originated from multi-layered and multi-species stands [57,71,72]. We chose the best functional form (Näslund function) to adequately describe the variations in the height-diameter relationship of individual trees for each vegetation type (Figure 3).…”
Section: Tree Height-diameter Model and Description Of The Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%