2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling group processes and effort estimation in project management using the Choquet integral: An MCDM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choquet integral, originally developed by Choquet (1953), provides a useful tool to model the inter-dependence or correlation among attributes (Angilella et al 2015;Ashayeri et al 2012;Belles-Sampera et al 2014;Bonetti et al 2010;Xu 2010;Xu and Xia 2011). However, the Choquet integral can only reflect the interaction between two adjacent coalitions and it cannot consider both the importance of elements and the ordered positions simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choquet integral, originally developed by Choquet (1953), provides a useful tool to model the inter-dependence or correlation among attributes (Angilella et al 2015;Ashayeri et al 2012;Belles-Sampera et al 2014;Bonetti et al 2010;Xu 2010;Xu and Xia 2011). However, the Choquet integral can only reflect the interaction between two adjacent coalitions and it cannot consider both the importance of elements and the ordered positions simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of own historical data is consequently crucial if one cannot be sure that the estimation model's core relationships are based on similar project contexts [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Methodology For Estimation With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research works in software development effort estimation have cited the Chaos report (De Araújo et al, 2012;Bonneti et al, 2012;De Araújo et al, 2012b;LagerstrÖm et al, 2012;Moløkken-Østvold & Jørgensen, 2003). This report found that more than half of software projects worldwide (around 61%) conducted between 2004 and 2012 were delivered with delay, were over budget and many were not even finished; just 39 percent were classified as successful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%