2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6sm01811d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and predicting the interactions between oppositely and variously charged polyelectrolytes by frontal analysis continuous capillary electrophoresis

Abstract: In this work, a systematic study of the interactions between poly(l-lysine) and variously charged statistical copolymers of acrylamide and 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonate (PAMAMPS) has been carried out by frontal analysis continuous capillary electrophoresis (FACCE). FACCE was successfully implemented to obtain the interaction parameters (binding constant and stoichiometry) at different ionic strengths and for different PAMAMPS charge densities varying between 15% and 100%. The range of investigated i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ionic strength did not significantly influence the binding stoichiometry whatever the PAMAMPS chemical charge density and the DGL generation number. This result is similar to what was observed in a previous work for linear PLL [41,42,43]. The fluctuations in stoichiometry were attributed to experimental errors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ionic strength did not significantly influence the binding stoichiometry whatever the PAMAMPS chemical charge density and the DGL generation number. This result is similar to what was observed in a previous work for linear PLL [41,42,43]. The fluctuations in stoichiometry were attributed to experimental errors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Isotherms of adsorption were plotted by representing the average number of bound ligands (DGL) per substrate molecule (PAMAMPS) truen¯ (calculated according to Equation (2)) vs. the free ligand concentration [ DGL ] for different initial molar ratio [ DGL ] 0 /[ PAMAMPS ] 0 . The stoichiometry of interaction n expressed in term of bound DGL entities per PAMAMPS chain and the binding site constant k were determined by non-linear least square routine on Microsoft excel using the model of identical interacting sites [42] expressed by Equation (3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, ACE possesses a great potential for investigation of the (bio)molecular noncovalent interactions under mild conditions and for estimation of binding (stability, association, formation) or dissociation constants of the formed complexes as demonstrated in several recent reviews and research articles . ACE involves several modes based either on the separation of the interacting species and determination of their equilibrium concentration, such as in the Hummel–Dreyer method , the vacancy peak method , frontal analysis , continuous frontal analysis , and kinetic CE , or on the detection of a specific physicochemical property of the complexed ligand or the binding partner, mostly the changes of effective mobility in the mobility shift assay or changes of migration times in the partial‐filling ACE . All these methods utilize the differences in the migration velocities of the interacting species.…”
Section: Separations By the Particular Ce And Cec Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between oppositely and variously charged polyelectrolytes, cationic poly(‐L‐lysine) (PLL) and variously charged statistical copolymers of acrylamide and 2‐acrylamido‐2‐methyl‐1‐propanesulfonate (PAMAMPS) with charge densities 15–100% were studied by frontal analysis continuous CE (FACCE) . FACCE performed in poly(diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) coated capillary in the high ionic strength BGE (12 mM Tris, 10 mM HCl, 305–990 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) enabled determination of binding constants and stoichiometry of the formed complexes.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding constants of complexes can be determined by several physico‐chemical methods, for example, by isothermal titration calorimetry , equilibrium dialysis , NMR or fluorescence spectrometry , MS , HPLC , and PAGE . In addition, several CE methods are available for determination of the binding constants of complexes, such as mobility shift ACE (ms‐ACE) , Hummel‐Dreyer (HD) method , mobility shift vacancy ACE , frontal analysis CE , continuous frontal analysis CE , kinetic CE and partial filling ACE (PF‐ACE) . The principles and comparison of these methods have been thoroughly discussed in several review articles .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%