2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22752-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling 3D craniofacial growth trajectories for population comparison and classification illustrated using sex-differences

Abstract: Many disorders present with characteristic abnormalities of the craniofacial complex. Precise descriptions of how and when these abnormalities emerge and change during childhood and adolescence can inform our understanding of their underlying pathology and facilitate diagnosis from craniofacial shape. In this paper we develop a framework for analysing how anatomical differences between populations emerge and change over time, and for binary group classification that adapts to the age of each participant. As a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also applied a flexible, non‐linear modelling technique that does not assume any particular form of the growth trajectory (Matthews et al. ). To the best of our knowledge, only Coquerelle et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also applied a flexible, non‐linear modelling technique that does not assume any particular form of the growth trajectory (Matthews et al. ). To the best of our knowledge, only Coquerelle et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Matthews et al. (). The goal is to estimate the expected shape or form of the mandible at each age as well as the expected rate and direction of change at each point on the mandible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of sex hormones on human craniofacial morphology is well documented and is most apparent in the post-pubertal dimorphism we see between male and female faces ( Kesterke et al, 2016 ; Matthews et al, 2018 ). The most prominent sex differences in human facial morphology tend to involve the mandible, zygomatic region (cheeks), lips, forehead, and nose ( Toma et al, 2008 ; Koudelová et al, 2015 ; Kesterke et al, 2016 ; Matthews et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in facial morphology between males and females are well documented, with major shape differences apparent in the jaw, lips, eyes, nose and cheek regions ( Toma et al, 2008 ; Klotz et al, 2010 ; Claes et al, 2012b ; Koudelová et al, 2015 ). Although facial sexual dimorphism has now been described in children ( Kesterke et al, 2016 ; Matthews et al, 2016 , 2018 ), differences become much more pronounced after the onset of puberty. This accelerated dimorphism post-puberty is the result of changes in circulating hormone levels, which regulate the development and differentiation of male and female primary and secondary sex characteristics, such as voice, body shape and facial morphology ( Hines, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%