Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815767-1.00014-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subadult sex estimation and KidStats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When estimating sex, it is commonly understood that bony features, which for any single trait can be arrayed on a spectrum from those regarded as typically male to female, only permit reliable assessments after adolescence. Sex estimates from skeletal characteristics for subadults are not sufficiently accurate for paleodemographic samplesthe bones of children are often poorly preserved and size-based estimates would be affected by uncertainty about the precise age and health status of the individuals examined-despite promising work currently underway (Stull et al, 2017(Stull et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Sex Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When estimating sex, it is commonly understood that bony features, which for any single trait can be arrayed on a spectrum from those regarded as typically male to female, only permit reliable assessments after adolescence. Sex estimates from skeletal characteristics for subadults are not sufficiently accurate for paleodemographic samplesthe bones of children are often poorly preserved and size-based estimates would be affected by uncertainty about the precise age and health status of the individuals examined-despite promising work currently underway (Stull et al, 2017(Stull et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Sex Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chi-square test showed significant differences in the matching of genetic and anthropological sex between adults and non-adults, which was to be expected as morphological methods for the sex assessment of non-adults are less reliable [ 8 , 9 ]. The chosen methods for the sex assessment of the adult individuals performed well, as only one (3%) assessment was wrong.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the preservation state can highly impact the possibility of performing sex assessment, as skeletal elements can be damaged or missing. Additionally, macroscopic methods for sex assessment of subadults are not accurate enough and are currently not advisable [ 8 , 9 ] as they need additional research [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stature was taken directly from full-body radiographs and include soft tissue for closer approximation to cadaveric stature (Stull, 2013). Both samples consist of pooled sex, as reliable methods of estimating sex from subadult remains have yet to be established (Cardoso & Saunders, 2008;Klales & Burns, 2017;Stull, Cirillo, et al, 2020;Stull & Godde, 2013). situation, the identified size variables ideally should beneed to beindependent of extrinsic and intrinsic population-level and age-level characteristics.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%