2012
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2012.2192126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Performance of Image Restoration From Motion Blur

Abstract: Abstract-When dealing with motion blur there is an inevitable trade-off between the amount of blur and the amount of noise in the acquired images. The effectiveness of any restoration algorithm typically depends on these amounts, and it is difficult to find their best balance in order to ease the restoration task. To face this problem, we provide a methodology for deriving a statistical model of the restoration performance of a given deblurring algorithm in case of arbitrary motion. Each restoration-error mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their analysis concludes that align-and-average works better than singleimage deconvolution. Boracchi and Foi [1] made the similar observation that restoration error of single-image deconvolution stabilizes after reaching a minimum. However, these results are limited to the single-image approach, while we focus on the case when multiple images are used.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Their analysis concludes that align-and-average works better than singleimage deconvolution. Boracchi and Foi [1] made the similar observation that restoration error of single-image deconvolution stabilizes after reaching a minimum. However, these results are limited to the single-image approach, while we focus on the case when multiple images are used.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(), we adopt a novel motion blurring augmentation strategy. We choose the image formation model developed by Boracchi and Foi () to simulate the motion blur effect, zTfalse(xfalse)=κfalse(uT(x)+η(x)false),xXwhere Xdouble-struckR2 denotes the sampling grid, and κ>0 is a scaling factor. The two terms uTfalse(xfalse) and η(x) are two independent random variables, which represent, respectively, the observation and a source of noise that is independent from the original image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining the sequential image displacements, there are several methods can be used to construct the long-exposure-time blur kernel [13]. The motion kernel (x, y) h is calculated by the relation…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%