2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of two-phase magnetic materials based on Jiles–Atherton theory of hysteresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the approach to saturation of such a combination may exhibit some peculiarities leading to the appearance of more than one knee in compound f an . This may be quite natural in multiphase materials [14] and indeed has been observed indirectly ( [15], Fig. 3) in amorphous ribbons after annealing, what led to creation of a significant fraction of superparamagnetic phase.…”
Section: A Linear Combinationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…On the other hand, the approach to saturation of such a combination may exhibit some peculiarities leading to the appearance of more than one knee in compound f an . This may be quite natural in multiphase materials [14] and indeed has been observed indirectly ( [15], Fig. 3) in amorphous ribbons after annealing, what led to creation of a significant fraction of superparamagnetic phase.…”
Section: A Linear Combinationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Each individual stage follows the general expression given by the VVPM [Eq. (4)], and we ensure continuity of σ B for −1 < m < 1. σ B is then given by (9) for the up cycle, and A phenomenological approach was used to identify each value of the exponent k, similar to recent works treating the modeling of the hysteresis of magnetic materials [28,31,65,66]. More precisely, they were obtained by fitting the measured [CoFeB(3Å)/Pd(10Å)] 15 multilayer, and application of the model to the remaining samples revealed that they remain unchanged as long as there is a negligible in-plane component of the magnetization.…”
Section: Distribution Of Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the random distributions of defects and surface roughness, a micromagnetic approach is impractical due to the prohibitively long simulation times required. Numerical calculations and semianalytical hysteresis models like the Preisach, Jiles-Atherton, and vector-hysteresis models have been used successfully to characterize qualitatively and quantitatively different kinds * Corresponding author: carlos.garcia@usm.cl of materials and magnetic arrays by modeling experimental hysteresis loops [27][28][29][30][31]. However, none of the models is able to properly describe the magnetization switching of a thin film material with PMA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b shows that the remanence magnetization and coercivity with the applied field were shifted from -3000 Oe to 3000 Oe. Moreover, coercivity was greatly influenced by many factors Raghunathan et al, 2012), such as size, and it increased with the increasing particle size. These results are in excellent agreement with the SEM image where Fe 3 O 4 at MCM-41 was shown to have much larger size than Fe 3 O 4 at MCM-41/APTS.…”
Section: Shape Size and Morphological Characteristics Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%