2016 3rd International Conference on Logistics Operations Management (GOL) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/gol.2016.7731681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of surface roughness in turning process by using Artificial Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article constitutes a considerable extension of our previous study, 8 where we modeled just one cutting performance (surface roughness) in turning of AISI 1042 steel under the same turning parameters considered in the current study. This modeling was performed by exploiting the same artificial intelligence technique and the developed network estimated surface roughness with high accuracy (R 2 > 95%, MSE < 0.1%, and APE < 10%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article constitutes a considerable extension of our previous study, 8 where we modeled just one cutting performance (surface roughness) in turning of AISI 1042 steel under the same turning parameters considered in the current study. This modeling was performed by exploiting the same artificial intelligence technique and the developed network estimated surface roughness with high accuracy (R 2 > 95%, MSE < 0.1%, and APE < 10%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current article constitutes a considerable extension of our previous study, 8 where we modeled the surface roughness in turning of AISI 1042 steel using the artificial neural networks (ANNs) approach. The developed network estimated this cutting performance with high accuracy (correlation coefficient (R 2 ) > 95%, mean squared error (MSE) < 0.1%, and average absolute error e < 10%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As presented in [42], without pre-processing, the results of ANFIS models are not considerable, so using a pre-processing function is unavoidable. This study used the Min and Max normalisation method [43] and the principal component analysis (PCA) method [44,45] as pre-processing processes for the experimental dataset. The dataset was then divided randomly into a test dataset (30%) and a training dataset (70%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazza et al [13] used SVM, EML and ANN and other prediction methods for signal analysis, to find the relationship between the vibration surface roughness, the predicted value and the actual measurement error. Dahbi et al [14] analyzed the processing conditions, such as cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and tool nose radius, so as to learn from the surface roughness of the neural network, from the forecast results can be learned very well, the error range within 10 %. Srinivasa Pai et al [15] considered the critical effect of tool radius in processing, and then used multi-layer sensing neural network to predict surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%