“…One explicit question is whether the pristine organic semiconductors are unintentionally doped or intrinsic. One school of thought strongly believes in the existence of involuntary doping of the organic semiconductor (or polymers) during synthesis or processing. − Another school of thought does not concur with the concept of involuntary doping; rather, it considers that the charge injection from the metal to the semiconductor through a Schottky barrier is the main source of charge within the semiconductor. , Metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS) capacitors, which are known to be essential diagnostic devices for studying field-effect transistors, can be a model system to understand the metal–insulator interface or the metal–semiconductor interface by analyzing capacitance–voltage ( C – V ) characteristics. ,, The existence of doping is mainly claimed on the basis of the linear part of the ( C –2 – V GB ) curve using the Mott–Schottky relation which is obtained from the standard C – V relation of MIS capacitors where C is the capacitance per unit area of the MIS capacitor, C i is the capacitance per unit area of the gate insulator, ϵ 0 is the permittivity of the free space, ϵ s is the dielectric constant of the semiconductor, V GB is the applied voltage at the gate electrode, V FB is the flat-band voltage, and N a/d is the doping concentration of the semiconductor (“a” denotes the acceptor, and “d” the donor). ,− However, in the case of undoped organic semiconductors, adopting the Mott–Schottky equation has been considered to be erroneous, as reported recently. , A physics-based analytical model to obtain the charge concentration, surface potential, and capacitance of the organic MIS capacitor has been recently demonstrated by our group. , The drift-diffusion of the charge carriers that are injected through the Schottky contact at the metal–semiconductor interface appears to be responsible for the capacitance variation with respect to voltage. A similar trend has also been observed in organic diodes. ,, Nevertheless, the universality of contact-induced charge injection has not yet been validated experimentally.…”