2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.793020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of charging effect and its correction by EB mask writer EBM-6000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also actual products with various pattern densities will be more challenging. It will need charging effect corrections (18) (19) , compensation with feedback to mask from metrology/inspection (20) (21) and further investigations to resolve those issues..…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also actual products with various pattern densities will be more challenging. It will need charging effect corrections (18) (19) , compensation with feedback to mask from metrology/inspection (20) (21) and further investigations to resolve those issues..…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two major solutions to address the charging effect: using mask blanks with a charge dissipation layer (CDL) that has conductivity to relieve the surface charge 44) [Fig. 15(a)], and using a charging effect correction (CEC) system [45][46][47][48][49][50] [Fig. 15(b)].…”
Section: Charging Effect Reduction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the amount of charge varies in a layout non-linearly with the beam exposure dose depending on the local pattern densities in consequence of proximity effect correction (PEC). IP error variations caused by change in those charge made it difficult to perform modeling in CEC system [26]. In order to enhance robustness of CEC model, we have developed the new electron optics CER2.0 for the MBM TM -2000PLUS.…”
Section: Cer20mentioning
confidence: 99%