Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118131350.ch32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Human Performance in Complex Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model's demand levels were established through benchmarks, as revealed by consensus judgments of experts in the workload field. For example, detection has a value of 1 within the visual channel, whereas reading a symbol has a value of 5.1 (Laughery, Plott, Matessa, Archer, & Lebiere, 2012). Thus, in the VACP model, a red line value is established within each channel, and whenever the combined demand of tasks within a channel exceeds that value, the red line is crossed, and performance is predicted to decline.…”
Section: Multiple-task Demand: Separate Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model's demand levels were established through benchmarks, as revealed by consensus judgments of experts in the workload field. For example, detection has a value of 1 within the visual channel, whereas reading a symbol has a value of 5.1 (Laughery, Plott, Matessa, Archer, & Lebiere, 2012). Thus, in the VACP model, a red line value is established within each channel, and whenever the combined demand of tasks within a channel exceeds that value, the red line is crossed, and performance is predicted to decline.…”
Section: Multiple-task Demand: Separate Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best example COMMENTARY ON LEE ET AL. (2019) 6 of such a framework may be ACT-R (Anderson & Lebiere, 1998), which has proven enormously useful and influential in the human factors literature (e.g., Laughery, Plott, Matessa, Archer, & Lebiere, 2012). We appreciate that in some cases, cognitive models cannot be easily generalized beyond the task in which they were developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive structure analysis utilizes foundational cognitive theory to establish a frame structure representing a potential object, principle and the operator's performing mechanism; then the human behavior in the complex system can be expressed as relevant factors in the structure [3]. For instance, Xie and Salvendy presented and verified a MW conceptual frame under single or multiple task environments, including instantaneous MW, average MW, accumulated MW and total MW, as well as a prediction model [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task network analysis does not generally need special mathematical modeling technology, but instead requires detailed task sequence and demanded time information [3]. For example, the Timeline Analysis and Prediction (TLAP) method worked out the timeline through elaborate task analysis and calculated MW in a certain time unit, which was the TR/TA (Time Required/Time Available) in the time unit [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation