2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Dense Star Clusters in the Milky Way and Beyond with the CMC Cluster Catalog

Abstract: We present a set of 148 independent N -body simulations of globular clusters (GCs) computed using the code CMC (Cluster Monte Carlo). At an age of ∼ 10−13 Gyr, the resulting models cover nearly the full range of cluster properties exhibited by the Milky Way GCs, including total mass, core and half-light radii, metallicity, and galactocentric distance. We use our models to investigate the role that stellarmass black holes play in the process of core collapse. Furthermore, we study how dynamical interactions aff… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
331
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
(286 reference statements)
24
331
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our value of ρ GC is larger than what was found by [18]: if we adopt their assumption of an average GC mass of 3 × 10 5 M ⊙ , we find that equation 2corresponds to a GC number density of n GC = 2.4 Mpc −3 , which is 3.3 times larger than their n GC = 0.72 Mpc −3 , but similar to the value used in [15] and [23]. Part of this difference is because we adopted a larger value of η: if we use their mild M h -dependent η from [39], we find n GC = 1.50 Mpc −3 , which corresponds to our lower error bar ⟨η⟩.…”
Section: A Present-day Gc Mass Densitysupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our value of ρ GC is larger than what was found by [18]: if we adopt their assumption of an average GC mass of 3 × 10 5 M ⊙ , we find that equation 2corresponds to a GC number density of n GC = 2.4 Mpc −3 , which is 3.3 times larger than their n GC = 0.72 Mpc −3 , but similar to the value used in [15] and [23]. Part of this difference is because we adopted a larger value of η: if we use their mild M h -dependent η from [39], we find n GC = 1.50 Mpc −3 , which corresponds to our lower error bar ⟨η⟩.…”
Section: A Present-day Gc Mass Densitysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We now use a simplified analytical model to gain some physical insights on this result. From equation (23), the merger rate for in-cluster binaries is…”
Section: A In-cluster Vs Ejected Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Kremer et al (2020b), 148 cluster simulations 11 were produced, varying the total number of particles (single stars plus binaries; =Ń 2 10 5 , 4×10 5 , 8×10 5 ,1.6 10 6 , and 3.2 10 6 ), initial cluster virial radius…”
Section: Cmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this happens, only the eccentricity at the final passage through this value is shown. In addition to the KL mergers (solid black) and non-KL mergers (dashed black), also included are the few-body capture (solid orange), single-single capture (dashed orange), ejected (solid blue), and in-cluster (dashed blue) binary mergers from Kremer et al (2020b), along with results from Kremer et al (2019), which show eccentricities for field binaries (solid pink). As the few-body capture and single-single capture mergers form at frequencies above 0.01 Hz, they are not included in the bottom panel.…”
Section: Eccentricitymentioning
confidence: 99%