2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.123016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merger rate of black hole binaries from globular clusters: Theoretical error bars and comparison to gravitational wave data from GWTC-2

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(207 reference statements)
6
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our prescription for estimating the IMBH mass in our population synthesis results gives a mean IMBH mass of about 5×10 3 M and a median mass of about 1.5 × 10 3 M . These estimated masses are consistent with constraints derived from simulations of young massive clusters and semi-analytical estimates for BH growth in dense environments (Antonini et al 2019;Antonini & Gieles 2020;Shi et al 2021). Using the initial stellar cluster mass distribution from Schaerer & Charbonnel (2011) in our population synthesis approach, we found that most of the stellar clusters that aggregate to form the NSC have initial masses between ∼ 10 5.5 to ∼ 10 6.5 M .…”
Section: Imbh Formation and Growth In Stellar Clusterssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our prescription for estimating the IMBH mass in our population synthesis results gives a mean IMBH mass of about 5×10 3 M and a median mass of about 1.5 × 10 3 M . These estimated masses are consistent with constraints derived from simulations of young massive clusters and semi-analytical estimates for BH growth in dense environments (Antonini et al 2019;Antonini & Gieles 2020;Shi et al 2021). Using the initial stellar cluster mass distribution from Schaerer & Charbonnel (2011) in our population synthesis approach, we found that most of the stellar clusters that aggregate to form the NSC have initial masses between ∼ 10 5.5 to ∼ 10 6.5 M .…”
Section: Imbh Formation and Growth In Stellar Clusterssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…By coupling a cluster age distribution model from [55] with the BBH merger delay time distributions gathered from the CMC models, a realistic distribution of dynamical BBH merger times can be assembled. In [46], this method was used to estimate a BBH merger rate of roughly 20 Gpc −3 yr −1 in the local universe (assuming all N; r v ; Z; and R gc values are equally weighted), consistent with similar rate estimates from other recent studies (e.g., [56][57][58]).…”
Section: B Globular Cluster Evolution With Cmcmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Numerous attempts have been made to leverage GW observations for characterizing the branching fractions between these channels or constraining uncertain physical processes governing these channels (Stevenson et al 2015;Rodriguez et al 2016b;Farr et al 2017a,b;Mandel et al 2017;Stevenson et al 2017a;Talbot & Thrane 2017;Vitale et al 2017;Zevin et al 2017;Barrett et al 2018;Taylor & Gerosa 2018;Arca Sedda & Benacquista 2019;Powell et al 2019;Roulet & Zaldarriaga 2019;Wysocki et al 2019;Abbott et al 2020c;Antonini & Gieles 2020a;Arca Sedda et al 2020;Baibhav et al 2020;Bavera et al 2020a;Bouffanais et al 2020;Farmer et al 2020;Fishbach & Holz 2020;Hall et al 2020;Kimball et al 2020a,b;Roulet et al 2020;Safarzadeh 2020;Wong et al 2020Wong et al , 2021Bhagwat et al 2021). However, due to the high complexity and dimensionality of the problem, these studies often restrict themselves to targeting a single channel or a small subset of channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%