2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) 2020
DOI: 10.23919/eucap48036.2020.9136077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Simulation for UAV Air-to-Ground mmWave Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [9] developed a generative neural network to predict the mmWave link state and model statistical channel parameters between a UAV and a ground BS. An empirical propagation loss model is proposed in [13] based on an extensive measurement for UAV-to-UAV communications at 60 GHz, and a traditional ray tracing method is applied in [14] to build a geometry-based stochastic model for UAV-to-vehicle communications at 28 GHz. Furthermore, the received signal strength and delay spread of mmWave transmissions is analyzed in [15] to provide further details for A2G channels.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors in [9] developed a generative neural network to predict the mmWave link state and model statistical channel parameters between a UAV and a ground BS. An empirical propagation loss model is proposed in [13] based on an extensive measurement for UAV-to-UAV communications at 60 GHz, and a traditional ray tracing method is applied in [14] to build a geometry-based stochastic model for UAV-to-vehicle communications at 28 GHz. Furthermore, the received signal strength and delay spread of mmWave transmissions is analyzed in [15] to provide further details for A2G channels.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fixed value of l max (G * ), the convergence rate will be constant, for any ordered set of ring structures. Therefore, the feasible solution leads to one identical outcome of the convergence time for (14), and it is the optimal result, as long as the UAV network has a ring structure.…”
Section: Appendix D Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the existing literatures, a lot of channel models have been studied in indoor or outdoor scenarios [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, there are few studies for the inside of tower structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most of mmWave channel models were mainly aimed at the land mobile communication scenarios [17,18], e.g., tunnel [19,20], microcellular environment [21], and high-voltage substation [22], etc. A few mmWave channel models involving UAV scenarios can be addressed in [23][24][25][26]. In [23,24], the authors used ray tracing (RT) simulated data to develop UAV mmWave channel models and analyze the channel parameters, i.e., received power, path delay, angle, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], a 3D non-stationary mmWave channel for UAV communication was proposed based on the geometry-based stochastic model (GBSM) method, but the flight velocity was constant and the receiving terminal was also fixed. Recently, the authors in [26] proposed a mmWave UAV channel model allowing 3D trajectories, but the rotation of 3D-shaped antenna array and the effect of beam-forming were not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%