2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6439/aba16f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and fabrication of electrostatically actuated diaphragms for on-chip valving of MEMS-compatible microfluidic systems

Abstract: This paper presents an analytical model to estimate the actuation potential of an electrostatic parylene-C diaphragm, processed on a glass wafer using standard microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) process technology, and integrable to polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based lab-on-a-chip systems to construct a normally-closed microvalve for flow manipulation. The accurate estimation of the pull-in voltage of the diaphragm is critical to preserve the feasibility of integration. Thus, we introduced an analytical mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we can see in figure 17(a) that in the unipolar mode, the tested tri-actuator travels around 50 µm with only 0-26.6 V of controlling voltage. By contrast, in [31] an average of 0-221 V is required for closing and opening a microfluidic channel with a depth of not more than 9.1 µm. In [32], a controlling voltage of 0-128 V was used to control the electrostatic actuator with serpentine springs for a range of 9.89 µm.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we can see in figure 17(a) that in the unipolar mode, the tested tri-actuator travels around 50 µm with only 0-26.6 V of controlling voltage. By contrast, in [31] an average of 0-221 V is required for closing and opening a microfluidic channel with a depth of not more than 9.1 µm. In [32], a controlling voltage of 0-128 V was used to control the electrostatic actuator with serpentine springs for a range of 9.89 µm.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One issue of this design is for having better leakage behavior, a thicker diaphragm is needed and as a result, a higher controlling voltage is required. This can be a serious problem as the regular pull-in voltage was as high as the average of 221 V [31]. Admassu et al built a parallel plate electrostatic microactuator with three spring-like x-beam configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desai et al [ 75 ] and Patrascu et al [ 76 ] designed a microvalve based on PDMS with a pull-in voltage of 150 V and a pressure capacity of 23 kPa and a life cycle of 400 times. Atik et al [ 77 ] prepared a normally closed valve on glass substrates as shown in Figure 8 . The valve required an average voltage of 221 V, the response time was less than microseconds, and the lifecycles was more than 50 times.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For flow rate control, micro valves with a high response speed that are electrostatic driven, electromagnetic driven, and piezoelectric driven are the most commonly used active micro valves. As electromagnetic-driven micro valves suffer from large chip areas [9,10] and the electrostatic-driven micro valves typically operate in binary mode, which requires a relatively large valve array to control the flow [11][12][13], piezoelectric-driven micro valves are utilized in this work to achieve continuously adjustable and high-precision flow rate control. However, the piezoelectric-driven micro valves usually require a complex fabrication process [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%