2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13092191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Design of SHPB to Characterize Brittle Materials under Compression for High Strain Rates

Abstract: This paper presents an analytical prediction coupled with numerical simulations of a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) that could be used during further experiments to measure the dynamic compression strength of concrete. The current study combines experimental, modeling and numerical results, permitting an inverse method by which to validate measurements. An analytical prediction is conducted to determine the waves propagation present in SHPB using a one-dimensional theory and assuming a strain rate depende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To measure the dynamic compression strength of concrete, Jankowiak et al. (2020) presented the analytical procedure and numerical simulation of the split Hopkinson pressure bar in which analytical prediction is performed to study the wave propagation in the test with strain rate dependency.…”
Section: Continuum Damage and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To measure the dynamic compression strength of concrete, Jankowiak et al. (2020) presented the analytical procedure and numerical simulation of the split Hopkinson pressure bar in which analytical prediction is performed to study the wave propagation in the test with strain rate dependency.…”
Section: Continuum Damage and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained from the experiment are the benchmark for the calibration of material constants. More details regarding material parameter calibration can be found in Jankowiak et al. (2020).…”
Section: Continuum Damage and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive tests at high temperature were also carried out. As the best long-term service temperature of nickel-based superalloy was up to 650 °C, with the maximum service temperature not exceeding 800 °C [19,20], the elevated temperature for this study Compressive tests at the ambient temperature (25 • C) were carried out for strain rates at 300, 900, 1400, 2700, and 3500 s −1 . Each rate was repeatedly tested twice.…”
Section: Split Hopkinson Compression Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive tests at high temperature were also carried out. As the best long-term service temperature of nickel-based superalloy was up to 650 • C, with the maximum service temperature not exceeding 800 • C [19,20], the elevated temperature for this study was chosen as 500 • C. An electric resistance furnace was added to the compression test setup, as shown in Figure 6. The incident and transmission bars were first kept out of the furnace, separated from the heating process of the specimen, with the heating rate set at 5 • C/s.…”
Section: Split Hopkinson Compression Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kucewicz et al [ 24 ] used a pulse shaper with a radius of 8 mm to conduct an SHPB experiment by LS-DYNA. Jankowiak et al [ 25 ] used a cylindrical copper shaper with 20 mm diameter and 1 mm thickness. Baranowsk et al [ 26 ] used three numerical modeling methods to establish the pulse shaper model to study the influence of mesh (particle) sensitivity on the characteristics of incident pulses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%