1989
DOI: 10.1063/1.102141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of growth of single-domain GaAs layers on double-domain Si substrates by molecular beam epitaxy

Abstract: Growth of single-domain GaAs (100) layers on double-domain Si (100) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy has been investigated. It has been shown that domain orientation of the top layer of GaAs depends on the surface structure of a buffer layer. The size of atomic step heights on the Si surface and the As-Si interaction temperature before film growth are not important factors in controlling domain orientation. Suppression of an antiphase disorder is explained in terms of nonstoichiometric antiphase boundary a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continued feeding of TMIn and TBP, however, allows the indium droplets to form on top of the wetting layer with subsequent nanowire growth by VLS. Another effect of annealing the 4° miscut substrate in TBP may be to create double-height steps, which eliminates antiphase domains upon the coalescence of nearby crystal nuclei. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Continued feeding of TMIn and TBP, however, allows the indium droplets to form on top of the wetting layer with subsequent nanowire growth by VLS. Another effect of annealing the 4° miscut substrate in TBP may be to create double-height steps, which eliminates antiphase domains upon the coalescence of nearby crystal nuclei. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another effect of annealing the 4°miscut substrate in TBP may be to create double-height steps, which eliminates antiphase domains upon the coalescence of nearby crystal nuclei. [27][28][29] Both samples A and B exhibit photoluminescence at 920 nm, which corresponds to the InP bandgap energy of 1.35 eV. By contrast, the photoluminescence peak for sample C is at 903 nm, or 1.38 eV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the growth on planar substrates, it was occasionally demonstrated back in the 80s that APBs could selfannihilate within the III-V layer, eventually leading to a decrease of the density of APBs emerging at the III-V surface. [35,[41][42][43][44][45] Although several studies have later corroborated these observations, [46][47] the process behind the annihilation mechanism remains unclear. In 1987, Kawbe et al proposed the existence of two types of APBs: APBs that run perpendicular to the interface and propagate through the whole III-V layer, and APBs that run on tilted planes and self-annihilate during growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding the growth on planar substrates, it was occasionally demonstrated back in the 80s that APBs could self‐annihilate within the III‐V layer, eventually leading to a decrease of the density of APBs emerging at the III‐V surface. [ 35,41–45 ] Although several studies have later corroborated these observations, [ 46–47 ] the process behind the annihilation mechanism remains unclear. In 1987, Kawbe et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with all double-height steps, so as to prevent anti-phase domains from forming. This structure has been obtained by several groups on single-domain Si (1 0 0) starting surfaces [27][28][29]. However, obtaining a single-domain As-passivated structure on Si (1 0 0) surfaces that are not originally single domain is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%