2002
DOI: 10.1300/j082v42n02_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mistakes That Heterosexual People Make When Trying to Appear Non-Prejudiced

Abstract: In two studies, lesbians, gay men and bisexuals were queried concerning mistakes that well-meaning heterosexual people have made when interacting with them. In qualitative, open-ended research, we determined that the most common mistakes concerned heterosexuals' pointing out that they know someone who is gay, emphasizing their lack of prejudice, and relying on stereotypes about gays. Following up with a quantitative, close-ended questionnaire, we determined that the mistakes respondents experienced most often … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LG individuals will seek partners who are more''feminine''than themselves, and vice versa (Brown & Groscup, 2009;Conley, Calhoun, Evett, & Devine, 2001). The present study suggests, however, that this idea of people being attracted to individuals with levels of masculinity-femininity complementary to their own appears to be true for neither heterosexual nor LG individuals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…LG individuals will seek partners who are more''feminine''than themselves, and vice versa (Brown & Groscup, 2009;Conley, Calhoun, Evett, & Devine, 2001). The present study suggests, however, that this idea of people being attracted to individuals with levels of masculinity-femininity complementary to their own appears to be true for neither heterosexual nor LG individuals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Allies have been the focus of research and theories in a number of different domains, including higher education (e.g., Reason & Broido, ), work organizations (Brooks & Edwards, ), preservice teacher training (Clark, ), and mental health professional training (Borgman, ; Dillon et al., ; Smith & Redington, ). The majority of the ally literature to date has addressed heterosexual allies to LGBT people (e.g., Conley, Calhoun, Evett, & Devine, ; Conley, Devine, Rabow, & Evett, ), but there is additional work on nondisabled allies to people with disabilities (e.g., Ostrove, Cole, et al., ; Ostrove & Crawford, ; Ostrove, Oliva, et al., ), men acting as allies to women concerning issues of rape (e.g., Casey & Smith, ; Fabiano, Perkins, Berkowitz, Linkenbach, & Stark, ), and White allies to people of color (e.g., Kivel, ). Across these various settings and identities, allies are generally conceived as dominant group members who work to end prejudice in their personal and professional lives, and relinquish social privileges conferred by their group status through their support of nondominant groups (Broido, ; Reason, Millar, & Scales, ; Washington & Evans, ).…”
Section: What Is An Ally?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, heterosexual bias leads people to make incorrect assumptions about the gay community as a whole, not just gay individuals or couples. For instance, a common assumption made by many heterosexual people is that all gay people know each other (Conley et al 2001).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%