Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2

Butcher, James N.; Dahlstrom, W. Grant; Graham, John R.; Tellegen, Auke; Kaemmer, Beverly

doi:10.1037/t15120-000

Cited by 747 publications

(1,074 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,026

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research with the second edition of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2: Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) found that patients with dissociative problems endorse MMPI-2 scales typically associated with psychotic symptoms (Allen & Coyne, 1995;Bliss, 1984). Similar to the MMPI, the SCL-90 may aid clinicians in assessing the severity and nature of subordinate diagnoses of patients with polysymptomatic presentations, but it does not aid clinicians in confirming the presence of DD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SCL–90 symptom patterns: Indicators of dissociative disorders

Steinberg

Barry²,

Sholomskas³

et al. 2005

Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SCL–90 symptom patterns: Indicators of dissociative disorders

Steinberg

Barry²,

Sholomskas³

et al. 2005

Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Localmente, para la medición de la ansiedad se cuenta con la adaptación y normas de diversas escalas pertenecientes a inventarios de personalidad, Con respecto a los primeros, el Cuestionario Multifacético de Personalidad de Minnesota (MMPI-2;Butcher, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989;Casullo, 1999) incluye dos escalas para valorar sintomatología ansiosa: la escala ansiedad de Butcher (Anx; Butcher et al, 1989) y la escala de Ansiedad de Welsh (A;Welsh, 1956). Ambas valoran principalmente síntomas cognitivos y afectivos asociados a la ansiedad generalizada.…”

Section: Operacionalizaciones De La Sintomatología Ansiosaunclassified

“…Se revisaron 10 escalas construidas específicamente para tal fin, 3 escalas de ansiedad pertenecientes a inventarios de personalidad y 1 perteneciente a inventarios de síntomas. Los instrumentos analizados fueron: el Inventario de Situaciones y Respuestas de Ansiedad (ISRA; Miguel Tobal & Cano Vindel, 1986), El Cuestionario Multifacético de Personalidad de Minnesota-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989;Casullo, 1999), la escala R del Inventario de Ansiedad Estado Rasgo (STAI-R; Leibovich de Figueroa, 1991;Spielberger et al, 1983), El Inventario Revisado de Personalidad NEO (NEOPI-R; Costa, & McCrae, 1992;Richaud, et al, 2001), El Listado Revisado de 90 Síntomas SCL-90-R (Casullo, 2004;Derogatis, 2002) Wittchen & Boyer, 1998).…”

Section: Procedimientounclassified

Construcción preliminar de una escala multidimensional para evaluar síntomas clínicos de ansiedad. Evidencias de validez de contenido y aparente

Kuaik

Iglesia

2017

Psicodebate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The measurement of anxiety should contemplate its multidimensionality. The instruments of local use present limitations related to incomplete approach to the dimensions of the construct, the content of its items, the capacity to discriminate the anxious symptoms of the depressives and the outdatedness with respect to the most current diagnoses. An instrument that takes into account the multidimensional conceptualization of anxiety and diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorder according to the latest version of the Diagnostic and Treatment Manual (DSM-5, American Psychiatric Association, 2013) may respond to the limitations of its predecessors. The construction of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale (EMA) aims to respond to this vacancy and constitute an instrument with good psychometric properties intended for the multidimensional evaluation of anxious symptomatology in the adult population. The present article describes the procedure carried out in the the writing of some reagents. The index of agreement among judges indicated that 18 items had little inter-agreement about membership in the assessed dimension.

show abstract

“…Based on information documented elsewhere (Bruns & Disorbio, 2003;Disorbio & Bruns, 2002), these tests were selected based on the fact that they (1) were developed for the assessment of patients with injury and pain, and underwent an extensive validation process; (2) assess most of the criteria identified by den Boer, Block, and the SCS literature; (3) have both medical patient and community norm groups; (4) have a standardized published form; (5) are short enough to be practical in the clinical setting (35 min for the BHI 2, and 10 for the BBHI 2); (6) have undergone multiple, favorable independent peer reviews by the Buros Institute (Hayes, 2007;Kavan, 2007;Sime, 2007;Vitelli, 2007); (7) have been integrated into clinical protocols (Bruns, Disorbio, & Hanks 2007;Disorbio, Bruns, & Barolat, 2006); (8) are based on a biopsychosocial theory (Bruns & Disorbio, 2005); (9) have been found to predict the outcome of multidisciplinary treatment for pain (Freedenfeld, Bailey, Bruns, Fuchs, & Kiser, 2002) and (10) The MMPI-2 (Butcher, 1989) has been widely used to assess medical patients, especially those with chronic pain (Keller & Butcher, 1991). The MMPI 2 was also administered to some of the patient subjects with particular attention being given to the Hs, D and Hy scales.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Biopsychosocial Risk Factors for Medical Treatment: A Collaborative Approach

Bruns

Disorbio

2009

J Clin Psychol Med Settings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a growing body of evidence that psychosocial variables have a significant ability to predict the outcome of medical treatment procedures, especially when the procedure is performed to reduce pain. The study described in this paper serves as an illustration of the valuable role psychologists can play in dealing with the challenges of biopsychosocial assessment of patients who are candidates for medical treatments, especially elective, invasive procedures. Based on a convergent model of risk factors that can potentially influence outcomes from spinal surgery and spinal cord stimulation, exclusionary and cautionary risk factors were identified, and the BHI 2 and BBHI 2 tests were used to assess them. An estimate of the prevalence of these risk factors was calculated using data obtained from 1,254 patient and community subjects gathered from 106 sites in 36 US states. Standardized Cautionary Risk and Exclusionary Risk scores demonstrated a test-retest reliability of .85 to .91. Evidence of validity of these scores was also provided based on subjective and objective criteria, using multiple groups of patients and community subjects. Recommendations are made regarding how biopsychosocial assessments could be used in collaborative settings for presurgical candidates to identify risks that could compromise a patient's ability to benefit from other medical treatments as well. Once identified, appropriate interventions could ameliorate these risks, or lead to the consideration of other treatments that are more likely to be effective. Methods of refining this approach for specific clinical applications are also discussed.

show abstract

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2

Cited by 747 publications

References 0 publications

SCL–90 symptom patterns: Indicators of dissociative disorders

SCL–90 symptom patterns: Indicators of dissociative disorders

Construcción preliminar de una escala multidimensional para evaluar síntomas clínicos de ansiedad. Evidencias de validez de contenido y aparente

Assessment of Biopsychosocial Risk Factors for Medical Treatment: A Collaborative Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About