Mineralization at the interface of implants

Joos, Ulrich; Wiesmann, Hans Peter; Szuwart, Thomas; Meyer, Ulrich

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.013

Cited by 62 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 89 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For a detailed description of the process we refer the reader to Davies (2003); Marco et al (2005); Puleo and Nanci (1999); Brunski (1999); Joos et al (2006) and the extensive number of references therein, from which the following description has been extracted.…”

Section: Brief Biological Overview Of Peri-implant Bone Healingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model

Moreo

García-Aznar

Doblaré

2009

Journal of Theoretical Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Brief Biological Overview Of Peri-implant Bone Healingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model

Moreo

García-Aznar

Doblaré

2009

Journal of Theoretical Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Osseointegration, which histologically is defined as “direct bone-to-implant contact”, is believed to provide rigid fixation of a dental implant within the alveolar bone and may promote the long-term success of dental implants (Franchi et al ., 2005, Joos et al ., 2006). The processes of osseointegration involve an initial interlocking between alveolar bone and the implant body (primary implant stability), and later, biological fixation through continuous bone apposition (contact osteogenesis) and remodeling toward the implant (secondary implant stability) (Berglundh et al ., 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants

Chang

Lang

Giannobile

2009

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives-The aim of this paper is to review current investigations on functional assessments of osseointegration and assess correlations to the peri-implant structure.Material and methods-The literature was electronically searched for studies of promoting dental implant osseointegration, functional assessments of implant stability, and finite element (FE) analyses in the field of implant dentistry, and any references regarding biological events during osseointegration were also cited as background information.Results-Osseointegration involves a cascade of protein and cell apposition, vascular invasion, de novo bone formation and maturation to achieve the primary and secondary dental implant stability. This process may be accelerated by alteration of the implant surface roughness, developing a biomimetric interface, or local delivery of growth-promoting factors. The current available preclinical and clinical biomechanical assessments demonstrated a variety of correlations to the peri-implant structural parameters, and functionally integrated peri-implant structure through FE optimization can offer strong correlation to the interfacial biomechanics.Conclusions-The progression of osseointegration may be accelerated by alteration of the implant interface as well as growth factor applications, and functional integration of peri-implant structure may be feasible to predict the implant function during osseointegration. More research in this field is still needed.

show abstract

“…Thereby, mineralization and tissue reformation by osteoblasts are co-related to the local mechanical environment [44]. The blood supply and nutrition are mandatory as osteoblast acting on the osteoid bone formation [45].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

To what extent residual alveolar ridge can be preserved by implant? A systematic review

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundIt has been reported that the load for (or to) implant-supported restoration may lead to bone remodeling as bone resorption and/or formation. While many authors supported the process of bone resorption, others elaborated bone apposition and increasing bone density close and remote to implant body (or fixture). This may suggest the role of the implant to reserve alveolar ridge from physiologic/pathologic resorption. The aim of this systematic review was to predict to how extend dental implants can preserve the residual alveolar ridge based on previous clinical investigations.MethodsThis systematic review based on the retrospective and prospective studies, randomized clinical trial, and case reports. The process of searching for proposed articles included PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases, with specific inclusion and exclusion criterion.ResultsA total 2139 citations were identified. After expunging the repeated articles between databases and application of exclusion and inclusion criteria, 18 articles were found to meet the topic of this systematic review. Many of the articles reported bone preservation with implant-assisted restorations, and the rest denoted noticeable bone apposition.ConclusionAccording to the published clinical studies, the behavior of bone remodeling around implant predicts a sort of residual alveolar bone preservation.

show abstract

Mineralization at the interface of implants

Cited by 62 publications

References 89 publications

Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model

Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model

Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants

To what extent residual alveolar ridge can be preserved by implant? A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About