Mind the “academician-practitioner” gap: an experience-based model in the food and beverage sector

Abstract

Purpose – This purpose of this paper is to introduce a research model inspired by the basic principles\ud of experiential research and apply it to the food and beverage industry. Thinkers and doers often do not\ud speak the same language: many scholars have pursued the goal of reducing the gap between\ud academicians and practitioners by introducing new research models or adapting existing ones. Two\ud case studies with wine and olive oil producers illustrate how the model works and highlight its\ud applicability. Background literature is provided to support the model.\ud Design/methodology/approach – In defining the model, we have followed several steps. First, we\ud searched the literature to identify research needs and insights that might be useful in formulating the\ud model. Second, we constructed a model following some procedural steps suggested in the literature.\ud Third, we tested a model to verify its applicability and functionality. The paper is structured as follows:\ud the first section explores the issue of academic–practitioner collaboration to identify the obstacles to\ud effective collaboration and to define possible benefits from reducing the gap. The second section\ud presents background literature on methodologies for enhancing cross-profession collaboration. Finally,\ud the model is described and two case studies are described to flesh out how the model works.\ud Findings – According to our experience and research results, this model is, paraphrasing Phillips\ud (1987), “warrantable” because it proposes continuous reflection to improve the alignment between\ud thinkers and doers: this method of conducting research is objective and bridges the gap between\ud researchers and practitioners. Because this model centres on experience, participant behaviours and\ud beliefs can be elicited about a host of nondurable goods. Having entrepreneurs put themselves in the\ud consumers’ position, and providing them the results of their experiment can be considered the real value\ud added of this approach. The model proposed in this paper opens a wider perspective in qualitative\ud research, and the two case studies demonstrate that it is particularly flexible for adaptation to various\ud businesses.\ud Research limitations/implications – More case studies could be useful to demonstrate the validity\ud of this model. Particularly, a longitudinal case study aiming at collecting data about the participants’\ud feedback in the long run could help in understanding the deep value of the proposed model.\ud Practical implications – While this paper illustrates two applications of the model with\ud entrepreneurs and managers of the wine and olive oil industry, this model offers potential for analysis\ud not only in the food and beverage sector but all fast-moving consumer goods sectors, as it can be adapted to techniques other than sensory analysis once researchers have confirmed that they fit with\ud the aim of the research and the peculiarities of the problem observed.\ud Social implications – Tools and methodologi...

Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata

“…This was possible also thanks to the quality of the relationships between researchers and stakeholders: trustworthiness, mutuality and commitment are the ground on which the partnerships involving the UNIMC’s research team has been developed since 2009. Most of the projects are characterised by the presence of a reciprocal flow of communication which led to shared visions, facilitating establishing shared goals and giving clear roles and tasks to each partner (Cavicchi et al 2014 ; Brookman-Frazee et al 2012 ; Drahota et al 2016 ).…”

“… UNIMC TEAM INVOLVEMENT Provision of super partes expertise, facilitation of the discussion among participants and stakeholder engagement about the process for creating and managing the network. (Cavicchi et al 2014 ). Stakeholder engagement for the collection of learning needs; design, creation and provision of the learning materials; management of the web portal.…”

“…Further aspects related to the methods applied by the research team have been analysed: the concept of mutuality , in which the relationship between the researcher and the stakeholders aims at creating reciprocal flows of communication and the concept of commitment with the personal involvement and coherence of the research design with the phenomenon observed (Cavicchi et al, 2014 ). Good relationships and trust among partners, which lead to shared visions and goals in order to provide operational steps and to pursue practical outcomes, characterise both CAPs and the Academician-Practitioner relationships (Brookman-Frazee et al 2012 ; Cavicchi et al 2014 ; Drahota et al 2016 ).…”

Universities and smart specialisation strategy

“…The case study protocol used is based on Yin (2009), Stake (1995) and Tellis (1997): during the initial phases of the research design an action research approach was adopted (Santini and Cavicchi, 2014). An action research approach aims to reduce the gap between theory and practice and facilitate knowledge dissemination, by stimulating flexibility and responsiveness in research through critical reflection (Cavicchi et al, 2014; IJSHE 19,1 Dick, 2002). A case study methodology has been selected because it was necessary to understand social complex phenomena, and this method allows investigators "to retain the holistic and meaningful characteristics of real-life events" (Yin, 2009, p. 4).…”

Bridging advertising practitioner theories and academic theories on how to communicate effectively with men and women

“…While academics publish research for their peers, they also have an interest in informing practitioners in the field (Cavicchi et al, 2014). Studies in marketing and advertising often include a section detailing practical implications of a study.…”