2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midline Abdominal Wall Closure: A New Prophylactic Mesh Concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The defect area after three weeks ranged from 32.1±5.5 to 35.6±3.1 squared centimeters and was similar to other reports that made only the acute full-thickness defect with areas ranging from 35 to 40 squared centimeters 9,10,18,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] . The hypothetic advantage of our model was to simulate the surgical findings in the human hernia repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The defect area after three weeks ranged from 32.1±5.5 to 35.6±3.1 squared centimeters and was similar to other reports that made only the acute full-thickness defect with areas ranging from 35 to 40 squared centimeters 9,10,18,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] . The hypothetic advantage of our model was to simulate the surgical findings in the human hernia repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the experimental setting, on using a t-shaped mesh in an animal model, it was also possible to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias [34]. But, once again, the question arises as to how such meshes are to be fixed so that they can assume an effective prophylactic role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of mesh has been shown to decrease the incidence of hernia recurrence [2][3][4]. However, the first generation of polypropylene and polyester meshes contained too much foreign tissue and led to chronic pain and stiffness of the abdominal wall after they had been implanted [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%