2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and solidification behavior of cast GaInSb alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the equilibrium segregation coefficient of In during the growth process of GaInSb crystal is only 0.2, resulting in a seriously uneven component distribution in the grown crystal [16]. Secondly, the segregation of In can lead to the formation of component supercooling at the front of the solid-liquid interface [17]. It is difficult for the solidliquid interface to maintain a flat or slightly convex shape during crystal growth, while the component supercooling will further intensify the bending of the solid-liquid interface, increase the thermal stress in the crystal near the interface, and promote the generation of defects such as dislocations, twinning, and microcracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the equilibrium segregation coefficient of In during the growth process of GaInSb crystal is only 0.2, resulting in a seriously uneven component distribution in the grown crystal [16]. Secondly, the segregation of In can lead to the formation of component supercooling at the front of the solid-liquid interface [17]. It is difficult for the solidliquid interface to maintain a flat or slightly convex shape during crystal growth, while the component supercooling will further intensify the bending of the solid-liquid interface, increase the thermal stress in the crystal near the interface, and promote the generation of defects such as dislocations, twinning, and microcracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is difficult to precisely control the composition ratio in the process of crystal growth without causing a large segregation of indium in the crystals. In addition, the non‐uniformity of the composition distribution at the front of the solid‐liquid interface may lead to the “constitutional super‐cooling”, resulting in instability of the growth interface and poor crystal quality …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semiconductor alloys that exhibit complete miscibility in both, liquid and solid, state as SiGe, InGaAs, and GaInSb, are of great interest as substrates for micro and optoelectronics, as well as bulk for thermophotovoltaic devices [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid-liquid (S-L) interface shape during growth process, the growth rate and the rejection on the third element towards the melt, are the main factors that make difficult the growth of these ingots with a structural and compositional homogeneity [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In this way, the main challenge to overcome when growing these ternary alloys is the indium segregation, that causes a constitutional supercooling (CSR) due to solute accumulation at S-L interface front [3,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%