2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0147-6513(03)00073-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micronucleus test in freshwater fish species: an evaluation of its sensitivity for application in field surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
2
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
48
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were described in studies carried out with other fish species establishing in situ frequencies (Rodriguez-Cea et al, 2003;Grisolia et al, 2009). The highest baseline MN and NA frequencies were found in the species S. brevipinna.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were described in studies carried out with other fish species establishing in situ frequencies (Rodriguez-Cea et al, 2003;Grisolia et al, 2009). The highest baseline MN and NA frequencies were found in the species S. brevipinna.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this way, several studies of biomonitoring in situ in rivers and lakes were accomplished using the micronucleus test with diverse fish species bringing about interspecific variation in baseline frequencies of genetic damage (Grisolia et al, 2009;Rodriguez-Cea et al, 2003). However, researches employing biomarkers in tropical and neotropical freshwater fish from South America are scarce (Rabitto et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wild fish, the quantification of ENMAs was proved useful to understand the type/intensity of chemical impacts in health (Rodriguez-Cea et al 2003). Those abnormalities are also regarded as indicators of cytotoxic/genotoxic damage in fish and, therefore, they are viewed as useful complements to MN scoring in genotoxicity surveys (Çavas and ErgeneGözükara 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay is well elaborated and allows to evaluate the genotoxicity of compounds at low concentrations and to assess doseresponse relationships of both DNA reactive and non-DNA reactive genotoxins (e.g. aneugens) (Al-Sabti et al, 1994;Palhares and Grisolia, 2002;Pacheco and Santos, 2002;Santos, 2002, 2003;Rodriguez-Cea et al, 2003;Teles et al, 2003) Micronuclei arise from chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes that lag at cell division due to lack of centromere, damage in centromere region, or defect in cytokinesis (Fenech, 2000). MN are small, secondary structures of chromatin, are surrounded by membranes, located in the cytoplasm and have no detectable link to the cell nucleus (Boller and Schmid, 1970;Heddle, 1973;Heddle et al, 1991;MacGregor, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%