Microleakage of different provisionalization techniques for class I inlays

Erkut, Selim; Çağlar, Alper; Yılmaz, Burak; Küçükeşmen, H. Cenker; Özdemir, Erdem

doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.12.004

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, contradicting study by Yilmaz D(Yilmaz and Gemalmaz, 2003) in 2003 showed their mean age was 25.5 and predominantly female. Another previous study by Erkut et al, (Erkut et al, 2013) in 2010 shows female patients are more than male patients who underwent class II inlay restoration. The consensus of this study was disagreed due to smaller sample size and had limited geographic centre.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 84%

Association of age and gender distribution of patient undergoing class ii inlay

2021

cibg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inlay restorations are one of the intracoronal restorations which is used commonly in dentistry in this era. Inlay restorations are known to be highly retentive compared to composite restorations in restorative procedures. This study was aimed to evaluate the gender prevalence and age distribution among patients undergoing class II inlay restorations who visited saveetha dental college in Chennai. From the record of 86000 cases (June 2019 -April 2020), all cases of class II inlay restorations were used for data analysis. A total of 40 case sheets were retrieved and cross checked for patients age and gender. The collected data was analysed through SPSS 2.0. Pearson correlation test was used for age and gender distribution for patients undergoing class II inlay restoration and Chi square test was done to evaluate the significance between the variables. Results were recorded. The highest age distribution was seen in 34-41 years old (frequency 35.5%) lowest age range for underwent class II inlay restoration was 58-65 years old (frequency 2.5%). The gender distribution showed predominantly male with a frequency of 67.5% (27 patients out of 40 in total), whereas female patients were only 32.5% who had undergone this treatment.Within the limitation of present study, it is concluded that in Saveetha Dental College, statistically no significant difference was seen in age and gender of the patients undergoing class II inlay restoration.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 84%

Association of age and gender distribution of patient undergoing class ii inlay

2021

cibg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ 22 ] In bonded restorations, the enamel margins are less susceptible to leakage than dentinal margins, because of resin-based restorative materials bond well with acid-etched enamel. [ 27 28 ] In recent studies reported that laminate preparation where located in aprismatic enamel or dentin cause mikroleakage at the cervical margin and the microleakage at cervical margin was greater than at the incisal margin. [ 22 26 ] 0.5 mm tissue reduction in cervical region is associated with dentinal exposure and this situation may increase the risk of lost marginal seal.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of polymerization and preparation techniques on the microleakage of composite laminate veneers

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Marginal leakage is the important factor influencing the maintenance of dental esthetic.Aim:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the preparation techniques and type of polymerization techniques on microleakage of composite laminate veneers.Materials and Methods:Ninety-one same sized, caries-free human maxillary central incisors were randomly assigned to 13 groups (n = 7) and were designed with four different preparation techniques (window type, feather type, bevel type, and incisal overlap type). One group determined as control group and any preparation was applied. Nanohybrid resin composite was used for restoration. Composite laminate veneers polymerized with three different techniques (direct light curing, indirect polymerization with a combination of pressure, light and heat using a light cup and heat cup, direct polymerization, and additionally heat cured in an oven). The specimens were thermocycled, and then immersed in 5% basic fuchsine solution. Following 24 h, all specimens were immersed in 65% nitric acid solutions for volumetric dye extraction test. Samples diluted with distilled water and centrifuged and microleakage determined by a spectrophotometer.Statistical Analysis Used:Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey honest significant difference post hoc multiple comparisons test (P < 0.05).Results:For comparing the microleakage value of preparation and polymerization techniques, Window type preparation showed a significant difference in direct polymerization + additional cured group (P < 0.05). Control group was statistically different from the other groups (P < 0.05).Conclusions:Window type laminate preparation can be preferred in indirect polymerization technique because it caused less leakage in this present study.

show abstract

Microleakage of different provisionalization techniques for class I inlays

Cited by 2 publications

References 33 publications

Association of age and gender distribution of patient undergoing class ii inlay

Association of age and gender distribution of patient undergoing class ii inlay

The effect of polymerization and preparation techniques on the microleakage of composite laminate veneers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About