2014
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 by spray-drying using sweet whey and skim milk as encapsulating materials

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of encapsulating material on encapsulation yield, resistance to passage through simulated gastrointestinal conditions, and viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 during storage. Microparticles were produced from reconstituted sweet whey or skim milk (30% total solids) inoculated with a suspension of L. acidophilus La-5 (1% vol/vol) and subjected to spray-drying at inlet and outlet temperatures of 180°C and 85 to 95°C, respectively. The samples were packed, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the encapsulation yield were similar to those obtained by Maciel et al (2014), when evaluating the microencapsulation of L. acidophilus La-5 by using spray drying skim milk and sweet whey (average 76.58%); however, higher than those found by Rodrigues et al (2015) Through the results obtained, were calculated the regression coefficients and it was observed that the quadratic term of the variable concentration of maltodextrin (p < 0.023882) and interaction of the variables temperature of the inlet air atomizer and concentration of maltodextrin (p < 0.043781) were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.10). Thus, there was obtained Equation 1, which represents the quadratic model of Encapsulation Yield of L. acidophilus La-5 as a function of the studied variables.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results for the encapsulation yield were similar to those obtained by Maciel et al (2014), when evaluating the microencapsulation of L. acidophilus La-5 by using spray drying skim milk and sweet whey (average 76.58%); however, higher than those found by Rodrigues et al (2015) Through the results obtained, were calculated the regression coefficients and it was observed that the quadratic term of the variable concentration of maltodextrin (p < 0.023882) and interaction of the variables temperature of the inlet air atomizer and concentration of maltodextrin (p < 0.043781) were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.10). Thus, there was obtained Equation 1, which represents the quadratic model of Encapsulation Yield of L. acidophilus La-5 as a function of the studied variables.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Among the techniques, the microencapsulation by spray drying involves the dispersal of cells in a polymer solution which is atomized in a drying chamber resulting in the evaporation of the solvent, and consequently in the formation of the microcapsules (Kent & Doherty, 2014). The use of the atomizer enables more easily the microencapsulation on an industrial scale, producing large amount of microcapsules economically and effectively (Maciel, Chaves, Grosso, & Gigante, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acidophilus La-5 microencapsulated in sweet whey by spray drying retained high viability during storage showing an average decrease of 0.43 log cfu.g −1 at the end of 90 days of storage and remaining higher than 6 log cfu.g −1 (Maciel et al 2014). The storage stability of probiotics in WP-based microcapsules was strain dependent; Lb.…”
Section: Post-preparation Behavior Of Probiotic Loaded Wp Micro-beadsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Spray drying Microencapsulation of probiotics by the spray drying techniques (Table 1) has the advantage of low-cost operation, better storage stability than frozen or fresh cultures, and the possibility of storage at room temperature (Maciel et al 2014). However, spray drying causes some viability losses of the encapsulated probiotics mainly due to the physical injury of the microcapsules, release of bacterial cells, and heat generation during the drying process.…”
Section: Techniques Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maciel et al (2014) reported an increase in the viability of L. acidophilus microencapsulated with sweet whey or skimmed milk by spray-drying during exposure to simulated gastrointestinal conditions at pH 2 to 7. Etchepare et al (2016) microencapsulated L. acidophilus in alginate beads with resistant starch (Himaize) and investigated the probiotic survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.…”
Section: Viability Of L Acidophilus Microencapsulatedmentioning
confidence: 99%