2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2006000500007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microclimatic characterization and productivity of coffee plants grown under shade of pigeon pea in Southern Brazil

Abstract: -Recent studies on coffee (Coffea arabica L.) cultivation in agroforestry systems in Southern Brazil have shown the potential of partial shading to improve management of this crop. The objective of this work was to evaluate microclimatic conditions and their effects on coffee production of plants shaded with pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in comparison to unshaded ones, from May 2001 to August 2002 in Londrina, State of Paraná, Brazil. The appraised microclimatic characteristics were: global radiation, photosynthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
40
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be translated into obvious advantages to the production of coffee plantations in dry and hot environments (DaMatta, 2004a;DaMatta and Ramalho, 2006), provided that shading is not excessive. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that under optimal or near-optimal edaphoclimatic conditions for coffee cultivation, such as those of the highlands (600-900 m above sea level) of southeastern Brazil, shading provides little, if any, benefit to the crop; in most cases it is even detrimental (Camargo, 1990;Campanha et al, 2004;Morais et al, 2006). Further comments on benefits and risks of using shade trees and criteria for selecting adequate species for agroforestry coffee systems are beyond the scope of this paper, so the reader is referred to comprehensive reviews by Beer (1987) and Beer et al (1998).…”
Section: Shading and Agroforestry Sys-temsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be translated into obvious advantages to the production of coffee plantations in dry and hot environments (DaMatta, 2004a;DaMatta and Ramalho, 2006), provided that shading is not excessive. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that under optimal or near-optimal edaphoclimatic conditions for coffee cultivation, such as those of the highlands (600-900 m above sea level) of southeastern Brazil, shading provides little, if any, benefit to the crop; in most cases it is even detrimental (Camargo, 1990;Campanha et al, 2004;Morais et al, 2006). Further comments on benefits and risks of using shade trees and criteria for selecting adequate species for agroforestry coffee systems are beyond the scope of this paper, so the reader is referred to comprehensive reviews by Beer (1987) and Beer et al (1998).…”
Section: Shading and Agroforestry Sys-temsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) production in agroforestry systems can offer many advantages to farmers interested in environmental services such as increasing local biodiversity, erosion reduction (Donald, 2004), improvement of water storage in soils (Lin and Richards, 2007), and mitigation of climatic extremes (Lin, 2007;Morais et al, 2006). It can also result in economic advantage by the generation of extra products and by the opportunity to explore alternative markets (Donald, 2004) and reduce the biennial pattern of coffee yield (Da Matta, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for this choice is the growth and yield reduction observed in shaded coffee trees compared with coffee trees under full sun (Campanha et al, 2004;Morais et al, 2006). In particular, under conditions of restricted water and nutrient availability the negative effect of low radiation on production becomes more evident (Da Matta, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this was contrary to other results of (Wintgens, 2004;Morais et al, 2006). However, some other reports have suggested that coffee plants that receive more sunlight with judicious level of soil mulch can produce a greater number of flowers (Beer et al, 1987;Vaast et al, 2006) This is because of the more number of nodes formed per lateral or more flower buds existing at each node (Wintgens, 2004;Cannel, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%