2010 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/memsys.2010.5442341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcantilever-based label-free thermal characterization of biomolecular affinity binding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microcantilevers functionalized with metal-binding protein “AgNt84-6”, are demonstrated for the detection of HMIs like Hg2+ and Zn2+ by Cherian et al (2003); SAMs (self-assembled monolayer’s) modified microcantilevers used for detection of Ca2+ ions by Ji and Thundat (2002); Arrays of microcantilever sensors encapsulated in fluidic wells by Venstra et al (2012) and fluidic channel by Xiang and Lee (2009); A Chitosan (CS)-graphene oxide (GO) Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensor by Kamaruddin et al (2014); a microcantilever/diaphragm-based system Wang et al (2010), Feng et al (2013); Lang et al (2013) and Hwang et al (2017), but all of these methods use optical readout which is a cumbersome method and required costly lab equipment. The optical readout has some disadvantages when used with microcantilever-based biosensor in the microfluidic environment when the refractive index of liquid changes and when used in opaque liquid because it absorbs the laser light by Thaysen (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcantilevers functionalized with metal-binding protein “AgNt84-6”, are demonstrated for the detection of HMIs like Hg2+ and Zn2+ by Cherian et al (2003); SAMs (self-assembled monolayer’s) modified microcantilevers used for detection of Ca2+ ions by Ji and Thundat (2002); Arrays of microcantilever sensors encapsulated in fluidic wells by Venstra et al (2012) and fluidic channel by Xiang and Lee (2009); A Chitosan (CS)-graphene oxide (GO) Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensor by Kamaruddin et al (2014); a microcantilever/diaphragm-based system Wang et al (2010), Feng et al (2013); Lang et al (2013) and Hwang et al (2017), but all of these methods use optical readout which is a cumbersome method and required costly lab equipment. The optical readout has some disadvantages when used with microcantilever-based biosensor in the microfluidic environment when the refractive index of liquid changes and when used in opaque liquid because it absorbs the laser light by Thaysen (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, Yoo et al [ 154 ] modified an avidin-sensitive membrane on the surface of a microcantilever by self-assembly and monitored in real time the binding process of a streptavidin ligand. In 2010, Wang et al [ 155 ] used a microcantilever modified by a platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) aptamer probe to quantitatively study the effect of temperature on the binding process between the probe and PDGF. As shown in Figure 13 , in their subsequent research from 2013, they integrated a microcantilever array modified by a PDGF aptamer on the microfluidic chip, and built a plug-and-play detection platform with a DVD-ROM as the optical detection module, which can realize fast, low-cost, and parallel detection [ 156 ].…”
Section: Application Of Genetic-probe-modified Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcantilevers functionalised with metal‐binding protein ‘AgNt84‐6’, are demonstrated for the detection of HMIs like Hg 2+ and Zn 2+ by Cherian et al [44]; SAMs (self‐assembled monolayer's) modified microcantilevers used for detection of Ca 2+ ions by Ji and Thundat [45]; arrays of microcantilever sensors encapsulated in fluidic wells by Venstra et al [46] and fluidic channel by Xiang and Lee [47]; A chitosan (CS)‐graphene oxide (GO) surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor by Kamaruddin et al [48]. A microcantilever/diaphragm‐based system [49–52], but all of these methods use optical readout, which is a cumbersome method and required costly lab equipment. The optical readout has some disadvantages when used with microcantilever‐based biosensors in the microfluidic environment when the refractive index of liquid changes and when used in opaque liquid because it absorbs the laser light by Thaysen [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%