2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-destructive cutting techniques for the characterization of natural limestone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 clearly shows that the intrinsic specific energy (ε) is very close to the uni-axial strength of the rock (q) when the back rake angle ranges from 5 • to 20 • , see Table 4. This result confirms previous findings by other researchers [11,20], see Fig. 5.…”
Section: Cutting Responses Atsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…4 clearly shows that the intrinsic specific energy (ε) is very close to the uni-axial strength of the rock (q) when the back rake angle ranges from 5 • to 20 • , see Table 4. This result confirms previous findings by other researchers [11,20], see Fig. 5.…”
Section: Cutting Responses Atsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Originally developed for use in petroleum engineering, the latter device has also recently been used (e.g. Theodoridou et al, 2015;Richard et al, 2012;Dagrain and Germay, 2006) to investigate material properties for various purposes, including conservation (e.g., Campbell et al, 2011;Dagrain et al, 2010b). Its mode of operation relies on the incremental formation of a groove on the surface of the test sample using a diamond cutter.…”
Section: Description Of Micro-destructive Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods have already been proven useful for assessing the mechanical properties of building materials either in the lab or, in the case of the DRMS, in-situ (e.g. Theodoridou et al, 2015;De Clercq et al, 2014;Richard et al, 2012;Fernandes and Lourenço, 2007;Dagrain and Germay, 2006;Tiano, 2001). Furthermore, they provide comparable results due to their similar mode of operation; this is based on cutting a material either by linear scratching or rotational drilling and subsequently recording its respective resistance Dagrain et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, research on the relationships between these techniques and UCS for a wide variety rock types is an increasingly hot topic. [9][10][11] Methods based on elastic ultrasonic waves measurement are the most common properties used for estimating UCS non-destructively. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Among these, the compressional or primary (P) wave velocity, Vp, (also named ultrasonic pulse velocity) is the most frequently used because of its easy determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%