2015
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b10589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro- and Nanopatterned Topographical Cues for Regulating Macrophage Cell Shape and Phenotype

Abstract: Controlling the interactions between macrophages and biomaterials is critical for modulating the response to implants. While it has long been thought that biomaterial surface chemistry regulates the immune response, recent studies have suggested that material geometry may in fact dominate. Our previous work demonstrated that elongation of macrophages regulates their polarization towards a pro-healing phenotype. In this work, we elucidate how surface topology might be leveraged to alter macrophage cell morpholo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
201
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(81 reference statements)
5
201
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 days versus 28 days post tissue injury) (Avula et al 2016; Helton et al ; Helton et al). Also, it has recently been suggested that biomaterial geometry, size and shape are players to dictate macrophage behavior (Luu et al 2015). An even more complicating factor is that a variety of CCL2 or CCR2 mutant/KO mice have been used in various implant/biomaterial studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 days versus 28 days post tissue injury) (Avula et al 2016; Helton et al ; Helton et al). Also, it has recently been suggested that biomaterial geometry, size and shape are players to dictate macrophage behavior (Luu et al 2015). An even more complicating factor is that a variety of CCL2 or CCR2 mutant/KO mice have been used in various implant/biomaterial studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the cells may only change shape and spread when the fiber thickness is above a certain threshold. The response of spreading is then associated with the activation of macrophage cells, as described in the literature [33]. The nanofibers also differs from microfibers in terms of surface protein adsorption and mechanical properties, which may also cause different tissue responses [7,34,35].…”
Section: In Vivo Biocompatibility Of Electrospun Pu Membranesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[7] Macrophages with spindle-like morphology are more likely to have a pro-healing phenotype, which contributes to tissue repair and wound healing, whereas the rounded "fried-egg" morphology shows pro-inflammatory behavior. [9] Surface patterns such as microgrooves, [10][11][12][13] wrinkles, [14] and concave/convex microstructures [15] have been reported to alter inflammatory responses of macrophages. [9] Surface patterns such as microgrooves, [10][11][12][13] wrinkles, [14] and concave/convex microstructures [15] have been reported to alter inflammatory responses of macrophages.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/admi201900677mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been observed that 2 and 10 µm width grooves in fused silica result in the elongation of macrophages and improved phagocytosis of microbeads compared with flat surfaces. [9] The effect of a wide range of materials including titanium, [11,17,20,21] polyvinylidene fluoride, [22] perfluoropolyether, [23] PDMS, [10,14,15] fused silica, [16] poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) [10] with micro-and nanostructures have been investigated on macrophage morphology and inflammatory responses with conflicting results. [15] Modification of surface chemistry such as charge and hydrophobicity can also impact macrophage phenotype; [17][18][19] however, topographical effects are believed to override the influence of surface chemistry.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/admi201900677mentioning
confidence: 99%