2009
DOI: 10.1080/01932690802477264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micellization of Cationic Surfactant Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide in Mixed Water-Alcohol Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S14,S15). This initial decrease is in accordance with many authors [2][3][4][5][6], for example Shirahama and Kashiwabara [2] but contrary to Nazir et al [35] and others [11,12], based on single-surfactant solutions. It results probably from the adsorption of propanol in the palisade layer of the micelles and reduction of unfavorable repulsive interactions between surfactant hydrophilic heads.…”
Section: Volumetric Properties Of Tx-100 and Ctab Mixture In The Aquesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…S14,S15). This initial decrease is in accordance with many authors [2][3][4][5][6], for example Shirahama and Kashiwabara [2] but contrary to Nazir et al [35] and others [11,12], based on single-surfactant solutions. It results probably from the adsorption of propanol in the palisade layer of the micelles and reduction of unfavorable repulsive interactions between surfactant hydrophilic heads.…”
Section: Volumetric Properties Of Tx-100 and Ctab Mixture In The Aquesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It means that the solubility of the surfactant into the system is increased by the presence of alcohol into the solution and, hence, the micellization process is delayed. In addition to breaking down the structure of water, alcohols lower its dielectric constant, thereby contributing to increase the CMC [26]. This lowering of the dielectric constant of the system with an increased alcohol percentage would also decrease the tendency of the counterions to keep bound to the micellar surface and, hence, would contribute to decrease the degree of counterion binding (b) of the surfactant (i.e., CTAB).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This leads to the promotion of the micellization process (i.e., decrease of CMC) as well as to the increase of b, due to the screening of the electrostatic repulsions among the ionic head groups of the surfactant. In this respect, Nazir et al [26] stated that the CMC of CTAB reaches a maximum value, due to the penetration of alcohol molecules into the micelles. However, they did not consider the whole range of alcohol concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this, less disruption of the solvent structure is necessary to accommodate the hydrocarbon chain of surfactant molecule making methanol-water a better solvent for surfactant molecules leading to delay in micellization process [33]. The variation of surface tension ( ) versus logarithm of surfactant concentration (log C t ) depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Cmc Of Surfactants In 1:1 Methanol-watermentioning
confidence: 99%